Version 1.9.2
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Version 1.9.2
I love gargoyle, but I want to ask a question: is not it time for a stable build (2.0?)?
I want to leave a suggestion: on routers ≥8mb flash, which come with SQM QoS pre installed
I want to leave a suggestion: on routers ≥8mb flash, which come with SQM QoS pre installed
Re: Version 1.9.2
First reason is silly ("to [sic] much hard work"...for whom?). Second clearly legitimate. Plenty of older 4 MB routers serve basic needs well without all of the bells & whistles. Fully stable on current Gargoyle builds.tapper wrote:IMO 4MB routers should be dropped all together! To much hard work to keep telling people that 4MB routers are unstable. When Gargoyle mooves to a later Kernel and ver of LEDE / OpenWRT I don't think that we will be able to get a build to fit in a 4MB router.
Re: Version 1.9.2
I think we first have to wait for the LEDE/OpenWrt remerge.prichard wrote:I love gargoyle, but I want to ask a question: is not it time for a stable build (2.0?)?
Then wait for Gargoyle to be build on this.
Re: Version 1.9.2
Hard work for me to keep repeating my self! It gets old you know! |-(Davey126 wrote:First reason is silly ("to [sic] much hard work"...for whom?). Second clearly legitimate. Plenty of older 4 MB routers serve basic needs well without all of the bells & whistles. Fully stable on current Gargoyle builds.tapper wrote:IMO 4MB routers should be dropped all together! To much hard work to keep telling people that 4MB routers are unstable. When Gargoyle mooves to a later Kernel and ver of LEDE / OpenWRT I don't think that we will be able to get a build to fit in a 4MB router.
4 meg routers are not stable on Gargoyle unless you leev all the things that make OpenWRT in to Gargoyle turned off. Even LEDE is having some trouble on 4 meg routers like opkg messing up and running out of memmory. There is people on the OpenWRT /LEDE forums and on IRC complaining about it all the time.
Linksys WRT3200ACM
NETGEAR Nighthawk R7800
NETGEAR R6260
NETGEAR Nighthawk R7800
NETGEAR R6260
Remote access on C7 broken Version 1.9.2
Latest Archer C7
Cannot access through Wan port.
Have tried ports 8080 and 90 on http only but does not seem to work.
Cannot access through Wan port.
Have tried ports 8080 and 90 on http only but does not seem to work.
Re: Remote access on C7 broken Version 1.9.2
Try LANHeathkit wrote:Latest Archer C7
Cannot access through Wan port.
Have tried ports 8080 and 90 on http only but does not seem to work.
Re: Version 1.9.2
I hope to see soon the merge of OpenWRT and LEDE, to make possible to implement these two awesome patches into Gargoyle
https://forum.lede-project.org/t/qualco ... -lede/4582
https://forum.lede-project.org/t/hardwa ... -lede/1094
https://forum.lede-project.org/t/qualco ... -lede/4582
https://forum.lede-project.org/t/hardwa ... -lede/1094
Tp-Link WR1043ND v1.4 using Gargoyle 1.7.2
Tp-Link WDR3600 v1.5 using OpenWRT CC by SamKnows

Tp-Link WDR3600 v1.5 using OpenWRT CC by SamKnows

Re: Version 1.9.2
Only fastpath and only if it get mainlined.
But yes I have been watching them with interest.
Doesn't mean we can't try it with custom builds of course.
But yes I have been watching them with interest.
Doesn't mean we can't try it with custom builds of course.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: Version 1.9.2
Yes - it is "hard work" singing the same old song under the same old set of assumptions that may not apply to all. I have Gargoyle 1.9.2 installed on two 4 MB routers that have been rock solid with this build and several prior ones. One reason I stick with this firmware. I have no issue dropping support for older/smaller routers as newer builds emerge. Seems you are advocating a complete withdraw of those older builds for no other reason that drawing a philosophical line in the sand. Silly (if I read the intent correctly).tapper wrote:Hard work for me to keep repeating my self! It gets old you know! |-(Davey126 wrote:First reason is silly ("to [sic] much hard work"...for whom?). Second clearly legitimate. Plenty of older 4 MB routers serve basic needs well without all of the bells & whistles. Fully stable on current Gargoyle builds.tapper wrote:IMO 4MB routers should be dropped all together! To much hard work to keep telling people that 4MB routers are unstable. When Gargoyle mooves to a later Kernel and ver of LEDE / OpenWRT I don't think that we will be able to get a build to fit in a 4MB router.
4 meg routers are not stable on Gargoyle unless you leev all the things that make OpenWRT in to Gargoyle turned off. Even LEDE is having some trouble on 4 meg routers like opkg messing up and running out of memmory. There is people on the OpenWRT /LEDE forums and on IRC complaining about it all the time.
Re: Version 1.9.2
Anyone noticed the pie chart layout for QoS distribution page is not fully shown on computer when viewed on Google Chrome? I only see one quarter of the pie chart..
It looks fine on Google Chrome on Android mobile though.
I had just installed 1.9.2 on WRT1900ACS.
It looks fine on Google Chrome on Android mobile though.
I had just installed 1.9.2 on WRT1900ACS.
Eric Wong
PM me if you need to buy Gargoyle router in Australia/NZ, willing to pay me to help you on your Gargoyle configurations or build custom configured ROM with pre-installed app or try to fix your bricked router. Yes, I am looking for job/work.
PM me if you need to buy Gargoyle router in Australia/NZ, willing to pay me to help you on your Gargoyle configurations or build custom configured ROM with pre-installed app or try to fix your bricked router. Yes, I am looking for job/work.