fq_codel

mestrefantasma · Post by **mestrefantasma** » Tue May 30, 2017 7:34 pm

Hello! I'm sorry for my ignorance but I've been doing some research on fq_codel and from what I understand it could solve my bufferbloat problem, so I wish I could use it with Gargoyle, how could I do that?

Post by **ispyisail** » Tue May 30, 2017 10:09 pm

https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/sqm

might be easier to use openwrt/lede

mestrefantasma · Post by **mestrefantasma** » Tue May 30, 2017 11:00 pm

ispyisail wrote:https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/sqm

might be easier to use openwrt/lede

I really like the gargoyle and it fills my needs with your QoS options and I would like to continue using it, so I wonder if there is an alternative that can be used with the gargoyle for the same situation. Thank you

Post by **Lantis** » Wed May 31, 2017 6:10 am

Unfortunately not.
You would need to do your own modifications.

Some people looked into it a while ago if you search for fq_codel Gargoyle, but no appreciable results reached

Post by **tapper** » Wed May 31, 2017 7:49 am

Hi when Gargoyle next upgrades to the LEDE code base there will be some fixes for bufferbloat, because some of the things to fix bufferbloat were built in to the kernel. So if you hang on for a bit things mite get better with Gargoyle. It could be some time be for that happens tho.

Volaris · Post by **Volaris** » Wed May 31, 2017 9:17 am

I was reading recently that Cake is somewhat of a successor or improvement to FQ_codel, and that it uses less resources. Is that something that could be compatible or a benefit to Gargoyle in the future?

https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake/
https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/co ... Technical/
http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2016/12 ... ulers.html

Post by **tapper** » Wed May 31, 2017 4:16 pm

Not sure mate. we will have to wait and see.

Post by **pbix** » Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:39 am

Gargoyle QoS (ACC) is already a more comprehensive solution to the bufferbloat issue than fq_codel or any other passive solution can possibly be.

Testing with fq_codel in the past showed no benefit in the Gargoyle QoS architecture and introduced serious stability issues.

Gargoyle users can be assured that they do not suffer from bufferbloat issues when ACC is on. And kackle with amusement when non-users complain about it.

Post by **tapper** » Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:48 am

Hi pbix are you the one who rote the QOS and ACC softwair for Gargoyle?

Post by **pbix** » Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:48 pm

The original design of both I did. Since then others have contributed as well.

Gargoyle Forum

fq_codel

fq_codel

Re: fq_codel

Re: fq_codel

Re: fq_codel

Re: fq_codel

Re: fq_codel

Re: fq_codel

Re: fq_codel

Re: fq_codel

Re: fq_codel