Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Want to share your OpenWrt / Gargoyle knowledge? Implemented a new feature? Let us know here.

Moderator: Moderators

yc3948
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:04 am

Re: Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Post by yc3948 »

ispyisail wrote:I would just go straight to Eric's official build
still very unstable after I back to Eric's official build... :evil: :evil: :evil:
any solution?
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2 DD-WRT v24SP2-MULTI (10/31/11) std
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH Gargoyle 1.5.9+1f082daf
Linksys WRT54GL Gargoyle 1.4.4
TP-Link TL-WR1043ND Gargoyle 1.5.9+1f082daf

ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5194
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Post by ispyisail »

My routers are working fine

I wonder if you have an IP conflict

I forgot to mention in the wiki that you need to be very careful with subnet addressing

Also, the server and client should not have identical LAN subnets, e.g. the server should have a 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 and the client should have 192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0.

Eric

ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5194
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Post by ispyisail »

Code: Select all

pc- 192.168.10.x (router) --internet --firewall -192.168.15.x --gargoyle router --192.168.5.x --PC
as an example

This is only an example as I have left some information out like WAN and LAN IP addressing

yc3948
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:04 am

Re: Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Post by yc3948 »

ispyisail wrote:My routers are working fine

I wonder if you have an IP conflict

I forgot to mention in the wiki that you need to be very careful with subnet addressing

Also, the server and client should not have identical LAN subnets, e.g. the server should have a 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 and the client should have 192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0.

Eric
you FW to Gargoyle 1.4.7 to Gargoyle 1.5.5 :D
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2 DD-WRT v24SP2-MULTI (10/31/11) std
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH Gargoyle 1.5.9+1f082daf
Linksys WRT54GL Gargoyle 1.4.4
TP-Link TL-WR1043ND Gargoyle 1.5.9+1f082daf

ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5194
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Post by ispyisail »

???


yc3948 wrote:
ispyisail wrote:My routers are working fine

I wonder if you have an IP conflict

I forgot to mention in the wiki that you need to be very careful with subnet addressing

Also, the server and client should not have identical LAN subnets, e.g. the server should have a 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 and the client should have 192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0.

Eric
you FW to Gargoyle 1.4.7 to Gargoyle 1.5.5 :D

yc3948
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:04 am

Re: Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Post by yc3948 »

All good now, I will run more test this weekend.
ispyisail wrote:???


you FW to Gargoyle 1.4.7 to Gargoyle 1.5.5 :D
[/quote]
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2 DD-WRT v24SP2-MULTI (10/31/11) std
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH Gargoyle 1.5.9+1f082daf
Linksys WRT54GL Gargoyle 1.4.4
TP-Link TL-WR1043ND Gargoyle 1.5.9+1f082daf

yc3948
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:04 am

Re: Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Post by yc3948 »

I think this only for router to router
ispyisail wrote:My routers are working fine

I wonder if you have an IP conflict

I forgot to mention in the wiki that you need to be very careful with subnet addressing

Also, the server and client should not have identical LAN subnets, e.g. the server should have a 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 and the client should have 192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0.

Eric
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2 DD-WRT v24SP2-MULTI (10/31/11) std
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH Gargoyle 1.5.9+1f082daf
Linksys WRT54GL Gargoyle 1.4.4
TP-Link TL-WR1043ND Gargoyle 1.5.9+1f082daf

doritos
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 2:02 pm

Re: Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Post by doritos »

ispyisail wrote: * bump openwrt backfire version
Most stable version for me in ages..

Even my HP wireless printer that never worked before with any firmware, is connected like a charm.

Trailblazer
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:12 am

Re: Revision d943969d 5 July 2012 12.04

Post by Trailblazer »

ispyisail wrote:USE AT YOUR OWN RISK

http://goo.gl/e4XfR
Thanks, ispy. I'm going to give this a try on my WNDR3700.

***Edit: Got it on there, seems to be working fine so far.
Netgear WNDR3700V2 Gargoyle 1.10.0
TP-LINK Archer C7 v4 Gargoyle 1.12

Post Reply