Gargoyle Forum

Entire configuration

I did some searching but the search function ignores the word "script" so nothing came up. Is there a handy script/cron already written to make a backup every x hours and save to an attached USB drive? I assume this would occur in crontab, but I'm mostly familiar with Debian and router com...

I have a /23 network with the gargoyle router on 192.168.2.1 and a pi-hole running on 192.168.3.48. When I put that into the DNS section of the basic setup, I get no DNS resolution. Is this a further issue of gargoyle not being set up to deal with larger /23 networks? Before this, I specified the Fa...

Super tip, that showed the problem. Below is a bit of output from logread: Thu Jan 6 20:24:29 2022 daemon.crit dnsmasq[2297]: bad DHCP host name at line 227 of /var/etc/dnsmasq.conf.cfg01411c Thu Jan 6 20:24:29 2022 daemon.crit dnsmasq[2297]: FAILED to start up And line 227 of /var/etc/dnsmasq.conf....

Ok, I can deal with that. I’ll just give out the range in the lower half.

Dnsmasq logs are where? Didn’t see them in /etc/logs.

Setting up a TL-WDR3600 from scratch with 1.13, and the DHCP server isn't handing out addresses. I'm basically copying the same setup from my old router on 1.10, but changing the subnet a bit. Am I missing something basic? Here's my /etc/config/network and /etc/config/dhcp files: config interface 'l...

Yes it is normal behaviour. I think you should look at a subnet calculator to understand what is going on. You’ve asked it to use a /23 (255.255.254.0) and it is doing just that :) Note that Gargoyle still isn’t well defined on subnets larger than a /24 so your mileage may vary I have it using a /2...

I think I'm probably running into a similar issue as https://www.gargoyle-router.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=12245&p=55415 but not sure. The assigned static IPs are assigned correctly, but it seems like the DHCP server is handing out in the 192.168.0.60-192.168.0.253 range. I wonder if I ...

I couldn't find anything from a quick search, but I have my DHCP server handing out addresses from 192.168.1.60-192.168.1.253 and then I changed my subnet mask to /23 and it's giving out 192.168.0.x in addition to the defined set. Is this normal behavior? I'm on 1.10.0, so maybe it's been fixed in t...