Gargoyle Forum

Yes sir, Gargoyle DHCP server is disabled. All wireless clients are directed to the main router's gateway address 192.168.1.1 for DNS and DHCP service. Gargoyle's IP is 192.168.1.2. It is puzzling me to see that IP.

My Gargoyle 1.9.0 (TPlink wdr3600) is working behind a pfSense router as a wireless AP. Almost every 10 seconds, pfSense is blocking the traffic coming from Gargoyle (192.168.1.2) as below: Source----------------Destination--------------Protocol 10.61.0.1:67 --------255.255.255.255:68 --------UDP My...

This how you connect two routers with using only the first router's firewall and DHCP server. ISP modem -> pfsense (router1) -> switch -> gargoyle (router 2) switch -> wired clients gargoyle ->wireless clients All users receive the same 192.168.1.x address and subnet mask Disable the DHCP server on ...

I am going to install it on a NUC platform.

So, is there a way to disable gargoyle firewall?

I don't want to configure two firewalls if possible, since there would be no benefit of it. Pfsense has much more options such as pocket sniffing, anti-virus scanning, anti-spam and such.

I am getting ready to install a pfSense firewall box between the ISP modem and Gargoyle router. pfSense box has a Wifi-n radio, WAN and LAN NICs, but no switch. Gargoyle 1.9.0 is running on TPlink WRT3600. Gargoyle firewall has port forwarding for streaming audio/video servers. I would prefer to use...

Thanks, moving the 5G connection to the top of the list was the solution.

I have this router for less than a week and experienced loss of internet connectivity today. Internet is restored if I reboot the router. I have setup dynamic dns, DHCP reservations and web monitor. No quotas, limitations or restrictions. QoS is disabled. 1.8.0 Model:TP-Link TL-WDR3600 v1 Device Con...

Macbook Air has dual band wifi-n radio. I want it to use non-congested 5 Ghz band but keep 2.4 Ghz as a backup. Often times it switches to 2.4 Ghz. Is there a way to force it to use 5 Ghz?

I missed the part that said increase your total bandwidth value. After doing that, it was close to the highest bandwidth minus the overhead. Thanks. I went back to version 1.8.0.