Gargoyle Forum

I think you'd need to do your own build, but I'll let Pythonic comment on whether he has a quicker option for you. The CT/non-CT debate is ongoing and it seems very much dependant on the device and the environment it is operating in (plus clients). If people felt strongly about it, I'd consider buil...

Nothing official
https://github.com/obsy/packages/tree/m ... lefailover

Can you SSH into the router when this issue happens?
If so, can you provide any logs that might assist in diagnosing the issue?

Classes are considered active above 4kbps in that class.
The active monitoring occurs above 12-15% of the upper link limit.

If you want to change these behaviours, you'll need to modify the source code.

I think you are mistaken, no one had it running. The two posts which mention it are spam. The text is just copied from somewhere else, a random hardware id is inserted. All for the purpose of throwing some dodgy links at the end. The one person who replied to the spam did not imply they were using t...

Nothing will change, and I don't think it will have any impact.

Very little help will be available for such an old version sorry.
A device with 2MB of flash is not capable of running any newer versions, so you don't have very many options.

You can rename the section in /etc/config/wireless

I don't know of any other way.

Call to action, the next time someone encounters this error, please make a copy of your bandwidth data before deleting it and PM me. I'd like to examine it and try to find out what went wrong.

Had a look at the FCC submission to find the exact chips used. It's a Broadcom soc with Broadcom WLAN hardware as well. Individually, both of those components appear to have minimal support in OpenWrt. The device itself I do not believe has been supported, but enough pieces appear to be in place tha...