Search found 7099 matches
- Wed Jul 02, 2025 7:00 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle 1.15.x OpenWrt 24.10 EXPERIMENTAL BETA - 2025-07-02
- Replies: 0
- Views: 10
Gargoyle 1.15.x OpenWrt 24.10 EXPERIMENTAL BETA - 2025-07-02
Gargoyle 1.15.x based on OpenWrt 24.10 is an EXPERIMENTAL BETA switching Gargoyle to the latest stable release from OpenWrt. This also includes the previous beta changes switching from iptables to nftables (firewall3 to firewall4). While I do not recommend keeping settings between OpenWrt 23.05 and...
- Tue Jul 01, 2025 8:50 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle 1.15.x BETA - 2025-03-31 - Based on OpenWrt 23.05
- Replies: 279
- Views: 617228
Re: Gargoyle 1.15.x BETA - 2025-03-31 - Based on OpenWrt 23.05
Lantis thanks for your time and effort! Sorry to bother you but I was wondering if you plan to add raspberry pi 5 support? With the onboard pcie adapter it’s easy to make two full speed gigabit Ethernet ports. Thanks again! In this beta? No it’s not possible. RPi 5 was only supported from the 24.10...
- Tue Jul 01, 2025 4:23 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: base_on_openwrt_2410
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2636
Re: base_on_openwrt_2410
I was in the process of releasing a beta and I discovered that there’s an issue with libewget fetching https websites, which prevents plugin install from repositories.
I’ll fix this and then it will be released.
I’ll fix this and then it will be released.
- Mon Jun 30, 2025 6:40 pm
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: Linksys EA8500
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5910
Re: Linksys EA8500
You can go one version prior https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds/details?build=1.15.x_20241113&target=ipq806x&dtf=eyJjIjpbMCwyXSwibyI6W1swLCJhc2MiXV0sInAiOjAsInBsIjoxMH0&dtr=eyJjIjpbMCwxLDIsM10sIm8iOltbMiwiYXNjIl1dLCJwIjowLCJwbCI6MTB9 I have no idea why the latest version ...
- Sun Jun 29, 2025 7:24 am
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: VPN network Theory (Gargoyle)
- Replies: 40
- Views: 777546
Re: VPN network Theory (Gargoyle)
No sir. Where you downloaded 1.15.x from there will be links to add the appropriate plugin repositories in. All plugins will then show up with appropriate versions. If you are still seeing plugins from an old install showing, did you keep settings? Or, you're using Extroot? Either one should be reset.
- Sat Jun 28, 2025 2:17 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: base_on_openwrt_2410
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2636
Re: base_on_openwrt_2410
Alright I've put one of these images into production for my home network and so far so good.
I have a reasonable level of confidence so far, will know more in a few days.
I have a reasonable level of confidence so far, will know more in a few days.
- Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:42 pm
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Slower internet while using Gargoyle (TP-Link Archer C7 v5)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2232
Re: Slower internet while using Gargoyle (TP-Link Archer C7 v5)
With the additional overhead of PPPoE, no sorry. Your device is pretty much tapped out without employing tricks like offloading which do not work with Gargoyle. You might gain back 10-15% by disabling the bandwidth monitor. This must be done on the command line. In v1.15.x there is a GUI toggle to d...
- Wed Jun 25, 2025 5:40 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: throttle bandwidth not work on Xiaomi Mi Mini (MT7620A)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 51324
Re: throttle bandwidth not work on Xiaomi Mi Mini (MT7620A)
The boot delay may be the check for busy Wifi frequencies that's a requirement in some/most regulatory domains in order to allow usage of high bandwidth channels or some of the 5Ghz channels (weather radar compatibility). It doesn't bother me at all 'cause uptime of my routers is measured in years ...
- Wed Jun 25, 2025 5:39 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: throttle bandwidth not work on Xiaomi Mi Mini (MT7620A)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 51324
Re: throttle bandwidth not work on Xiaomi Mi Mini (MT7620A)
What is your WAN? Is it wired or wireless? Do you have quotas or QoS enabled? Boot time should not be significantly longer than plain OpenWrt before the web interface becomes accessible. On my minipc it is 10s or less lol. On a GLiNET MT6000 I would say 30-45s web interface up. Access to the interne...
- Wed Jun 25, 2025 3:54 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: base_on_openwrt_2410
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2636
Re: base_on_openwrt_2410
Not quite yet, give me a few more days.
I’ve only tested x86/64 and mediatek/filogic, and have only committed the former.
I’m doing a bulk update of all packages to their latest available (I’m past halfway). Will then check all targets compile successfully and push them in.
I’ve only tested x86/64 and mediatek/filogic, and have only committed the former.
I’m doing a bulk update of all packages to their latest available (I’m past halfway). Will then check all targets compile successfully and push them in.