Hosts with Active Connections 10.85.0.1

Report wireless and/or network connectivity problems in this forum.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
pmerrill
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:23 pm

Hosts with Active Connections 10.85.0.1

Post by pmerrill »

I needed to execute a tracert just now and noticed the following output.

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 18 ms 9 ms 18 ms 10.85.0.1

I expect the 192.168.1.1 but the 10.85.0.1 throws me? Is there some process that runs in the router that has an internal IP address? Maybe the QoS Service?

It is also listed as a host with an active connection on the Connected Hosts page with an unknown hostname and an unknown host MAC.

Can someone confirm this is what should be happening?
Paul
Gargoyle 1.11.x on TP-Link Archer C7 V2 H/W

mix
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:18 am

Re: Hosts with Active Connections 10.85.0.1

Post by mix »

Post the output of the full traceroute to this thread.
WRT54GL v1.1
Gargoyle 1.4.7

pmerrill
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:23 pm

Re: Hosts with Active Connections 10.85.0.1

Post by pmerrill »

I think I may know the problem, I will check tonight. I have connected to my company's VPN from home and I think that the address is the address of the VPN access point.

I'm not sure why though it's persisting after I've disconnected. Perhaps I need to officially logout rather than just shutdown. I'll give it a go tonight and report back.
Paul
Gargoyle 1.11.x on TP-Link Archer C7 V2 H/W

pmerrill
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:23 pm

Re: Hosts with Active Connections 10.85.0.1

Post by pmerrill »

Still havn't figured it out. Current connections show below. Here's a tracert from my PC to www.google.com.

>tracert www.google.com

Tracing route to www.l.google.com [74.125.237.115]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Gargoyle.lan [192.168.1.1]
2 95 ms 75 ms 116 ms 10.85.0.1
3 51 ms 19 ms 38 ms sbr4-ge2-1-7.gw.optusnet.com.au [198.142.160.49]

4 38 ms 13 ms 58 ms xe-3-1-0.sd31.optus.net.au [119.225.41.253]
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 29 ms 16 ms 48 ms google.sd13.optus.net.au [119.225.36.2]
7 17 ms 62 ms 15 ms 66.249.95.232
8 24 ms 59 ms 11 ms 72.14.237.135
9 43 ms 80 ms 29 ms syd01s12-in-f19.1e100.net [74.125.237.115]

Trace complete.

I'm using OpenDNS as my DNS, don't know if that has anything to do with it or not.

Since Port 67 has to do with DHCP, perhaps it has something to do with the way the DHCP service works in OpenWRT???
Attachments
Capture.PNG
Capture.PNG (2.17 KiB) Viewed 6585 times
Paul
Gargoyle 1.11.x on TP-Link Archer C7 V2 H/W

pbix
Developer
Posts: 1373
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:09 pm

Re: Hosts with Active Connections 10.85.0.1

Post by pbix »

Looks like your ISP gateway and the connection looks like your DHCP connection to your ISP. Are you using DHCP for your WAN connection type?

Look at your status screen under WAN. What is the gateway?
Linksys WRT1900ACv2
Netgear WNDR3700v2
TP Link 1043ND v3
TP-Link TL-WDR3600 v1
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2
WRT54G-TM

mix
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:18 am

Re: Hosts with Active Connections 10.85.0.1

Post by mix »

Yeah, 10.85.0.1 is on your isp's internal network. Plenty of isp's use private ip addresses for their internal network, even mine:

Tracing route to http://www.l.google.com [74.125.113.106]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms Gargoyle.lan [192.168.3.1]
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms 10.15.25.126
4 12 ms 12 ms 13 ms 10.15.8.49
5 55 ms 28 ms 28 ms core1-0-0-8.lga.net.google.com [198.32.118.39]
6 26 ms 28 ms 28 ms 209.85.248.180
7 29 ms 36 ms 26 ms 209.85.251.88
8 62 ms 53 ms 32 ms 72.14.239.93
9 46 ms 44 ms 44 ms 209.85.241.222
10 46 ms 44 ms 43 ms 64.233.174.87
11 * 54 ms * 216.239.47.250
12 45 ms 44 ms 44 ms vw-in-f106.1e100.net [74.125.113.106]

Trace complete.
WRT54GL v1.1
Gargoyle 1.4.7

jFlash
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 12:50 am

Re: Hosts with Active Connections 10.85.0.1

Post by jFlash »

Hi,

I have noticed that some virtual machines will install a virtual adapter vbox and vmware in particular. Do you have these installed on any machine on your network?

jFlash

pmerrill
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:23 pm

Re: Hosts with Active Connections 10.85.0.1

Post by pmerrill »

jFlash wrote:Hi,

I have noticed that some virtual machines will install a virtual adapter vbox and vmware in particular. Do you have these installed on any machine on your network?

jFlash
Nope. The major devices I have installed are:
Minitar VoIP box MVA-11A
2 Squeezebox Booms (Logitech)
couple printers, one wired, one wireless
1 Synology 110j NAS
various iphone/Android
1 TP-Link SF1005D 5 port switch
Paul
Gargoyle 1.11.x on TP-Link Archer C7 V2 H/W

Post Reply