high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
Moderator: Moderators
high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
I have noticed in 1.10 that there seems a bug in the bandwidth usage page.
When "high resolution" is enabled, most of the active IPs do not show up in the drop down list for plot 2 and 3 under either hostname or ip. There are only 2 or 3 at most times. It does not seem to be that the list is only those with traffic, seems to be a random list only.
When "high resolution" is enabled, most of the active IPs do not show up in the drop down list for plot 2 and 3 under either hostname or ip. There are only 2 or 3 at most times. It does not seem to be that the list is only those with traffic, seems to be a random list only.
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
screen shot please
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
here are some shots.
#1: high resolution enabled
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dRoNFE ... sp=sharing
#2: high resolution disabled
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JI9WmI ... sp=sharing
#3: high resolution re-enabled
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cavUzA ... sp=sharing
As you can see, the list in #3 is different from #1 although no changes were made and it was only a minute apart. the list in #2 seems complete
#1: high resolution enabled
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dRoNFE ... sp=sharing
#2: high resolution disabled
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JI9WmI ... sp=sharing
#3: high resolution re-enabled
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cavUzA ... sp=sharing
As you can see, the list in #3 is different from #1 although no changes were made and it was only a minute apart. the list in #2 seems complete
Last edited by dsalch on Tue Oct 02, 2018 5:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
the attachments are not coming through. The error says "board attachment quota has been reached"
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
Please post them externally as per viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11043
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
Ahh, sorry! I didnt realize.
Original message updated below
Original message updated below
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
The bandwidth histories for high resolution vs low resolution are stored separately.
I expect that when you enabled it originally, not many devices had registered to the network and had not presented themselves to the list.
It's only a guess, but i don't see any other logical explanation. They literally behave exactly the same besides the number of data points in the files.
I expect that when you enabled it originally, not many devices had registered to the network and had not presented themselves to the list.
It's only a guess, but i don't see any other logical explanation. They literally behave exactly the same besides the number of data points in the files.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
That was my first thought, but doesnt hold up in practice. in the screen shots below, the high definition is always enabled. so the first shot with only 2 or 3 hosts is after 12 hours of running. Then for hte second shot i disable high resolution and all the hosts appear. Then immediately after i re-enable high resolution and a different but shorter lists comes up. The list size seems to actually decrease over time, not increase. disabling and re-enabling brings more hosts.
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
Seems to be a duplicate of:
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=10736
I noticed the exact same symptoms OP is describing.
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=10736
I noticed the exact same symptoms OP is describing.
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
yes, it does seem the same problem.