Being someone who just flashed from DDWRT to Gargoyle 1.5.3 I can say that this thing is absolutely brilliant. Yes some DDWRT functions dont work as intended (like QoS). QoS is a hit or miss with the different versions of DDWRT. I too have experienced your Tx power issues however mine caps out at 16 rather than 7.
Stick with Garg if you dont truly need the bazillion features of DDWRT. If your a simple small home user and need the ever popular QoS then Garg can do that for you.
DD-WRT or gargoyle for DIR-601?
Moderator: Moderators
- DoesItMatter
- Moderator
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 3:56 pm
Re: DD-WRT or gargoyle for DIR-601?
You can try Options -> Securitybuggers wrote:thx for the links.
Does anyone know how to get firefox to save the login password for the router page?
Make sure the checkbox is enabled for
Remember passwords for sites
But I never use this so I don't know if it will work with Gargoyle.
I thought Eric mentioned sometime way back, that he had code to
not allow this for security reasons, but I could be wrong.


2x Asus RT-N16 = Asus 3.0.0.4.374.43 Merlin
2x Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH V1 A0D0 = Gargoyle 1.9.x / LEDE 17.01.x
2x Engenius - ESR900 Stock 1.4.0 / OpenWRT Trunk 49400
Re: DD-WRT or gargoyle for DIR-601?
Tals, new with v1.5.4 classes divide BW equally by IP address so you might not need these separate classes any more. Also for you I increased ACC dynamic range to 6:1. You should check out both features and start a new thread to let me know how it goes.tals wrote:The qos in gargoyle is relatively straight forward. Numerous ways to set up but how I did mine was set the classes per person in household
Linksys WRT1900ACv2
Netgear WNDR3700v2
TP Link 1043ND v3
TP-Link TL-WDR3600 v1
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2
WRT54G-TM
Netgear WNDR3700v2
TP Link 1043ND v3
TP-Link TL-WDR3600 v1
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2
WRT54G-TM