Report problems and success stories with Gargoyle on various hardware platforms.
Moderator: Moderators
NJI
Posts: 18 Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 2:33 pm
Post
by NJI » Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:27 am
mix wrote: I think the idea is to prove whether your bandwidth increases past 4-5 MB/s using any of these different channels.
is it going to make a big difference? probably these networks will change to other channels as well
Can I disable the firewall to increase throughput? Actually, I tried
but I also lost the internet connection if the firewall is off
TP-Link TL-WR1043ND (v1.7)
Gargoyle 1.4.4
mix
Posts: 292 Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:18 am
Post
by mix » Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:00 am
Most routers don't change channels automatically. In any case, the fact you are having stability issues (as you noted in another thread) as well as throughput issues doesn't bode well for the current wifi drivers included in the latest Gargoyle firmware (as well as OpenWRT). Eric seems to include the latest and greatest OpenWRT revision with each Gargoyle release, so whenever this gets fixed in OpenWRT, it should get fixed here.
WRT54GL v1.1
Gargoyle 1.4.7
ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5212 Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand
Post
by ispyisail » Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:29 pm
jaykumar2001
Posts: 27 Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:16 pm
Post
by jaykumar2001 » Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:50 pm
Any performance improvement in 1.4.4 or 1.5.1?
Any one want to share their real world wifi throughput on L-WR1043ND Gargoyle?
TL-WR1043ND - Gargoyle 1.5.2
DIR-300 - DD-Wrt v24 preSP2 (Build14896)
DoesItMatter
Moderator
Posts: 1373 Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 3:56 pm
Post
by DoesItMatter » Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:42 pm
jaykumar2001 wrote: Any performance improvement in 1.4.4 or 1.5.1?
Any one want to share their real world wifi throughput on L-WR1043ND Gargoyle?
There were driver updates in 1.4.4 and 1.5.1 so yes, you should
upgrade to one of those and do your own testing as well.
1.4.4 is the stable branch, and unless you want to try out TOR,
stick with the 1.4.x branch for stability purposes.
Soylent Green Is People!
2x Asus RT-N16 = Asus 3.0.0.4.374.43 Merlin
2x Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH V1 A0D0 = Gargoyle 1.9.x / LEDE 17.01.x
2x Engenius - ESR900 Stock 1.4.0 / OpenWRT Trunk 49400
jaykumar2001
Posts: 27 Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:16 pm
Post
by jaykumar2001 » Sun Jan 01, 2012 1:56 pm
I was having stability issues with 1.4.1 and 1.4.2, frequent wifi drops and router rebooted on its own. No logs in syslog or logread (kept a ssh session open with logread -f) therefore upgraded to 1.5.2 (TL-WR1043ND)
My Dell laptop has "DW1520 Wireless-N WLAN Half-Mini Card" and the max connection speed I get (Task Manager --> Networking) is 130mbps. No way I can increase it to 300mbps.
Here is my wireless config
Code: Select all
config 'wifi-device' 'radio0'
option 'type' 'mac80211'
option 'macaddr' 'b0:48:xx:xx:xx:xx'
option 'hwmode' '11ng'
list 'ht_capab' 'SHORT-GI-40'
list 'ht_capab' 'DSSS_CCK-40'
option 'noscan' '1'
option 'bursting' '1'
option 'compression' '1'
option 'channel' '11'
option 'htmode' 'HT40-'
option 'distance' '40'
config 'wifi-iface' 'apcfg'
option 'device' 'radio0'
option 'mode' 'ap'
option 'network' 'lan'
option 'ssid' 'xxxxxxxx'
option 'encryption' 'psk'
option 'key' 'xxxxxxx'
Any one using same combination of hardware and getting better wifi speed/throughput?
TL-WR1043ND - Gargoyle 1.5.2
DIR-300 - DD-Wrt v24 preSP2 (Build14896)
ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5212 Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand
Post
by ispyisail » Sun Jan 01, 2012 3:22 pm
How about trying 1.5.2 with SWAP
http://www.gargoyle-router.com/wiki/dok ... =swap_file
jaykumar2001 wrote: I was having stability issues with 1.4.1 and 1.4.2, frequent wifi drops and router rebooted on its own. No logs in syslog or logread (kept a ssh session open with logread -f) therefore upgraded to 1.5.2 (TL-WR1043ND)
My Dell laptop has "DW1520 Wireless-N WLAN Half-Mini Card" and the max connection speed I get (Task Manager --> Networking) is 130mbps. No way I can increase it to 300mbps.
Here is my wireless config
Code: Select all
config 'wifi-device' 'radio0'
option 'type' 'mac80211'
option 'macaddr' 'b0:48:xx:xx:xx:xx'
option 'hwmode' '11ng'
list 'ht_capab' 'SHORT-GI-40'
list 'ht_capab' 'DSSS_CCK-40'
option 'noscan' '1'
option 'bursting' '1'
option 'compression' '1'
option 'channel' '11'
option 'htmode' 'HT40-'
option 'distance' '40'
config 'wifi-iface' 'apcfg'
option 'device' 'radio0'
option 'mode' 'ap'
option 'network' 'lan'
option 'ssid' 'xxxxxxxx'
option 'encryption' 'psk'
option 'key' 'xxxxxxx'
Any one using same combination of hardware and getting better wifi speed/throughput?
hnl_dk
Moderator
Posts: 408 Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:37 pm
Post
by hnl_dk » Sun Jan 01, 2012 3:24 pm
jaykumar2001 wrote: ...
My Dell laptop has "DW1520 Wireless-N WLAN Half-Mini Card" and the max connection speed I get (Task Manager --> Networking) is 130mbps. No way I can increase it to 300mbps.
...
Try changing the channel to a channel that is not used in your neighborhood.
If you have an Android phone, are you able to check it easily with this app...
https://market.android.com/details?id=c ... yzer&hl=da
Router: TL-WR1043ND - Gargoyle 1.5.4
AP: TL-WR1043ND - Gargoyle 1.5.4
jaykumar2001
Posts: 27 Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:16 pm
Post
by jaykumar2001 » Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:08 am
Yup, I am on the least noisy channel. Using Dell DW WLAN card utility to find out the wifi signal in the neighborhood.
Here is the output
Attachments
Site Monitor.jpg (113.92 KiB) Viewed 12080 times
Link Status.jpg (86.72 KiB) Viewed 12080 times
TL-WR1043ND - Gargoyle 1.5.2
DIR-300 - DD-Wrt v24 preSP2 (Build14896)
DoesItMatter
Moderator
Posts: 1373 Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 3:56 pm
Post
by DoesItMatter » Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:51 am
300mbps speed is theoretical maximum you can attain.
In reality, you will never hit that speed.
Also, there is another set of issues working against you.
The driver manufacturers (Realtek, Atheros, Broadcom, Intel, etc)
DO NOT have a set standard of reporting speeds.
One manufacturer will report the theoretical max speed of connection.
Another manufacturer will report the ACTUAL speed of the connection.
You can never go by the reported connection speed.
Your best test for what you are actually getting is to do a standard
file transfer test from a LAN wired PC to a wireless connected PC.
Or you can also do it through some NAS connected device.
Don't test actual speed from a wireless to a wireless because you
lose some of the speed due to processing overhead,
error correction, etc.
And best test is a 500MB to 1GB file size.
That will give true transfer performance testing.
Soylent Green Is People!
2x Asus RT-N16 = Asus 3.0.0.4.374.43 Merlin
2x Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH V1 A0D0 = Gargoyle 1.9.x / LEDE 17.01.x
2x Engenius - ESR900 Stock 1.4.0 / OpenWRT Trunk 49400