Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

The latest news about Gargoyle

Moderator: Moderators

skaox
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:21 pm

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by skaox »

For the tplink tl-wr1043n-v5 - 1.13.x -> 1.14.0
sysupgrade didn't work even without keeping settings
until Restore Default Configuration then sysupgrade ok.

Lantis wrote:
Thu Jun 22, 2023 7:08 am
I had not noticed that ipq40xx was omitted from the downloads page, however the images are on the server and available for download.
I’ll ping Eric and see if that’s easy enough to fix.
Yes they are on the Server and folders are not browsable
I found the image I wanted to try for the linksys mr8300 :
https://www.gargoyle-router.com/downloa ... actory.bin

Thank you

ysy
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 12:24 pm
Location: Hong Kong !!

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by ysy »

Hello, Feel grateful to see the project still going strong. Just would like to report that I managed to flash and set up Xiaomi Miwifi Mini with success. On top of a couple of minor glitches, I'd love to see guest wifi users being allocated a different subnet for enhanced security and usability. Pls keep up the good work. Cheers

wilsonhlacerda
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 5:47 pm

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by wilsonhlacerda »

Eric3K wrote:
Fri Jun 02, 2023 10:47 pm
No luck with preserving settings on my Archer C7 v4. The wireless settings didn't show any 5GHz options, and when I switched it from AP+WDS to Access point, something in the JS glitched such that every available field became visible, making it impossible to make any further changes without filling out every single required field. Thankfully, it worked fine after resetting to defaults.

It doesn't appear compatible with my WDR4300 v1.3, even with default settings. It wouldn't activate the wireless interfaces and seemed to only briefly activate DHCP on ethernet before becoming unresponsive, and I ended up having to use TFTP to revert to 1.13.

Glad to see my service discovery fix made it in, though!
Has anyone successfully upgraded TP-LINK TL-WDR4300 (or TL-WDR3600) to v1.14 without problems? Working fine? Thanks for reporting!

I was short on time and couldn't yet (it is on my parent's house). By the way, this can be of interest (BUG on v1.13): viewtopic.php?p=65440#p65440

raven
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:25 am

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by raven »

Hi Lantis, is this version 1.14 using latest stable release openwrt 22.03.5 or just version 22.03?

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6753
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by Lantis »

wilsonhlacerda wrote:
Thu Jun 29, 2023 8:43 pm
this can be of interest (BUG on v1.13): viewtopic.php?p=65440#p65440
Per my reply in the other thread, this is not a bug.
1.14 will behave the exact same way as it is required to.
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6753
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by Lantis »

raven wrote:
Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:12 pm
Hi Lantis, is this version 1.14 using latest stable release openwrt 22.03.5 or just version 22.03?
22.03.5 for the official release. We will bump it further as part of development of course.
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

raven
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:25 am

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by raven »

ysy wrote:
Mon Jun 26, 2023 6:25 am
Hello, Feel grateful to see the project still going strong. Just would like to report that I managed to flash and set up Xiaomi Miwifi Mini with success. On top of a couple of minor glitches, I'd love to see guest wifi users being allocated a different subnet for enhanced security and usability. Pls keep up the good work. Cheers
How do you compare to version 1.13, in terms of performance and stability?

dsalch
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:09 pm
Location: Tx

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by dsalch »

Upgrade questions:

1. I am have an older TP-Link router running 1.12.0 that should really upgrade. Do I need to 1.13 and then 1.14 as separate upgrades, or is it safe just to apply 1.14

2. For this 2 level upgrade, is it safe to keep configs or do i need to configure from scratch?

thanks!

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6753
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by Lantis »

Yes you can go straight there.
No you can’t keep config, even if you do it as 2 jumps.
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

ysy
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 12:24 pm
Location: Hong Kong !!

Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03

Post by ysy »

raven wrote:
Sat Jul 01, 2023 9:24 am
ysy wrote:
Mon Jun 26, 2023 6:25 am
Hello, Feel grateful to see the project still going strong. Just would like to report that I managed to flash and set up Xiaomi Miwifi Mini with success. On top of a couple of minor glitches, I'd love to see guest wifi users being allocated a different subnet for enhanced security and usability. Pls keep up the good work. Cheers
How do you compare to version 1.13, in terms of performance and stability?
For me v1.14 seems a bit more taxing on the hardware. As long as I have QoS enable for both up and down streams, it works.

Post Reply