So it is well . I, a small country user, have noticed that something is happening (viewtopic.php?f=14&t=12054&start=10#p53674)... This is usually the case - the least used one will notice it. I'm glad I already know the truth - nothing happens, no one is infallible and we are just people . We Czechs have a saying: "i mistr tesař se někdy utne"...
Turris Omnia with OpenWrt 21.02 - Tested
Linksys WRT3200ACM with Gargoyle 1.13.x
TL-WR1043ND v2 with Gargoyle 1.10.0
http://gargoyle.romanhk.cz custom builds by gargoyle users
I'm at work ready for a big test session and I thought I would try the "July-06" again before trying other builds.
Plug it in and it just worked
I've done many tests now and the conclusion I've come to is the Bank EFT POS system went down for 30 minutes to an hour. The time it took me to rebuild a 1.10.0 the bank system was running again so I assumed it was a build problem. When customers are queuing it puts the pressure on.
Ubiquiti RouterStation Pro
Running 1.11.0 (still need to do some more tests)
tl-wdr3600
This build works but I need OpenVPN and I couldn't install plugins.
I deleted my posts about EFT POS because they were rubbish. I would have moved them but I couldn't work out how. I don't want people thinking this build is bad.
After a couple of days the EFT POS problem came back.
i'm still monitoring.
I switched the router (1.10.0) and it starting working instantly.
The EFT POS machine has a fixed IP set by the Bank. 192.168.1.162 port 20001
I've created a fixed IP on Gargoyle (1.11.0.x) that is the same as whats has been manually installed on the EFT POS machine, so far it seams to be working.
I've seen a couple of complaints about a loss of throughput on R7800s running OpenWrt 18.06.4 (independent of CPU frequency governor settings) that are at odds with the report I have for the experimental R7800 1.11.0 image which makes me wonder whether the kernel changes that triggered the 18.06.[34] release (SACK?) are starting to show undesirable side effects for some use cases
1.11.0 or a 1.11.0.x build before the 18.06.[34] bump might still be an interesting test case...