Hello,
I'm wondering if Gargoyle is still in active development.
* Eric's last post was a year ago
* There haven't been any routers available in the shop for a few months now
* The most recent version of Gargoyle (1.10.0) is a year old
I'm not chomping at the bit for new versions or features, but I am wondering about the present and future of Gargoyle development and whether there will be routers available in the store again.
If not, is there a recommended third-party router that I can flash Gargoyle on?
Thank you!
Gargoyle still in active development?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:47 pm
Re: Gargoyle still in active development?
Per this thread it looks like Gargoyle 1.11.0 is in active development, so that pretty much answers my question: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=11743
User Lantis is very active in the forums, so it might be that Eric is just away on other business; maybe the store itself is just not active or is between recommended models of router.
User Lantis is very active in the forums, so it might be that Eric is just away on other business; maybe the store itself is just not active or is between recommended models of router.
Re: Gargoyle still in active development?
Gargoyle is still active
https://github.com/ericpaulbishop/gargo ... ntributors
Lantis appears to be driving things these days.
LEDE / OpenWRT split in my opinion held things up for a couple of years.
At a basic level Gargoyle is just a GUI for OpenWRT.
There is no doubt that Eric is not as active as he once was?
https://github.com/ericpaulbishop/gargo ... ntributors
Lantis appears to be driving things these days.
LEDE / OpenWRT split in my opinion held things up for a couple of years.
At a basic level Gargoyle is just a GUI for OpenWRT.
There is no doubt that Eric is not as active as he once was?
Re: Gargoyle still in active development?
I’m keeping it going on my end at the moment.
I don’t have any current intentions of stopping.
Eric has popped up every few weeks and pushed my code through so he is still around. I expect just busy.
I don’t have any current intentions of stopping.
Eric has popped up every few weeks and pushed my code through so he is still around. I expect just busy.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: Gargoyle still in active development?
Realistically speaking though, this project is much closer to dead than alive. I liked it very much, but seems it's time to look for more active alternatives, unless you have an very old router.
Re: Gargoyle still in active development?
Gargoyle is just a GUI for OpenWRTvivat wrote:Realistically speaking though, this project is much closer to dead than alive. I liked it very much, but seems it's time to look for more active alternatives, unless you have an very old router.
https://github.com/ericpaulbishop/gargo ... rt_remerge
Re: Gargoyle still in active development?
I can’t control the website, so I can’t do “official” releases.
But I’ve pushed more changes, features and bug fixes in the last 12 months than ever before. And I’ve done unofficial releases for people.
As long as people can get past the words “unofficial” and “experimental” and “beta”, then this project will go on.
If you feel strongly about it, send an email to the project founder.
But I’ve pushed more changes, features and bug fixes in the last 12 months than ever before. And I’ve done unofficial releases for people.
As long as people can get past the words “unofficial” and “experimental” and “beta”, then this project will go on.
If you feel strongly about it, send an email to the project founder.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: Gargoyle still in active development?
If you take 2 mins per day to read this forum you`ll realise how incorrect that statement is.vivat wrote:Realistically speaking though, this project is much closer to dead than alive. I liked it very much, but seems it's time to look for more active alternatives, unless you have an very old router.
WDR4300 v1 (stock)
WR941nd v2 (1.9.2)
WA901nd v2 (1.6.2)
2x WR741nd (1.6.2)
(Up to) 1gbps up/down link
WR941nd v2 (1.9.2)
WA901nd v2 (1.6.2)
2x WR741nd (1.6.2)
(Up to) 1gbps up/down link
Re: Gargoyle still in active development?
Gargoyle is still going! Just look at all the new posts to the forums every day. The new build will be out soon. Chill! All tho I do wish eric was a bit mor activ!
Linksys WRT3200ACM
NETGEAR Nighthawk R7800
NETGEAR R6260
NETGEAR Nighthawk R7800
NETGEAR R6260