Version 1.9.2
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Version 1.9.2
Yes, because you are using 40 MHz with second channel below.
If we allowed you to choose channels 1-4, the "second channel below" would fall out of the spectrum.
We are stopping you from making configurations that cannot be used.
If you set it to 40MHz with second channel above, you will lose 10-14.
If we allowed you to choose channels 1-4, the "second channel below" would fall out of the spectrum.
We are stopping you from making configurations that cannot be used.
If you set it to 40MHz with second channel above, you will lose 10-14.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: Version 1.9.2
Same with the above user.darkdark wrote:I am using WRZ-HP-G300NH, first time using gargoyle flashed 1.9.2 last night,now I am testing, so far nothing wrong, but here are some things I am wondering.
2. the wifi channel is from 1 to 7 only, cannot go to 8 to 13.
You are likely using 40MHz, and therefore some channels have been disabled to stop you going out of band.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: Version 1.9.2
Believe i have resolved this. Have sent it to Eric for perusal/approval.Lantis wrote:It's probably an issue with the interface. I'll check it.
I'm surprised the wifi didn't fire up though. Usually the settings save fine but the interface doesn't reflect the settings.
The Connection Basic page is very complicated with lots of interconnected dependencies. It is a fragile creature.
Have pushed a fix for this one as well.Lantis wrote:mvebu appears to have a regression at the moment with usb. I'm looking into it. It appears we may have people at the wheels blindly applying commits upstream.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:53 pm
Re: Version 1.9.2
Ok... nice to be of helpLantis wrote:Believe i have resolved this. Have sent it to Eric for perusal/approval.
The Connection Basic page is very complicated with lots of interconnected dependencies. It is a fragile creature.

If you want me to do a few tests, let me know how I can help further.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 5:05 pm
Re: Version 1.9.2
Yes, you nailed it. I guess you are protecting me from myself with the channel above/below settings. Thanks !Lantis wrote:Are you using 40MHz?
If so, this is entirely expected.
Re: Version 1.9.2
Faced with the following problem
I'm using the media server Home Media Server (UPnP-DLNA) content for viewing on the LG TV
In versions 1.8.X everything worked well
Now, when the routers connected clients on the wireless network and need to use the Bridge IP from a different subnet.
On the TV, I do not have access to media server until the TV is not running "Network status"
After the check comes I see a media server on your TV

Wiring plan now such
Router AP (ip 192.168.1.1) <---Wi-Fi---> Router Connected Via Client bridge (gw 192.168.1.1, Bridge IP: 192.168.2.1) <--- LAN ---> TV
I'm using the media server Home Media Server (UPnP-DLNA) content for viewing on the LG TV
In versions 1.8.X everything worked well
Now, when the routers connected clients on the wireless network and need to use the Bridge IP from a different subnet.
On the TV, I do not have access to media server until the TV is not running "Network status"
After the check comes I see a media server on your TV
Wiring plan now such
Router AP (ip 192.168.1.1) <---Wi-Fi---> Router Connected Via Client bridge (gw 192.168.1.1, Bridge IP: 192.168.2.1) <--- LAN ---> TV
Re: Version 1.9.2
You don't really need to have a different subnet for the bridge, so use the same and see if it works.
Re: Version 1.9.2
This is not the correct way to set up a bridge using relayd.manierofx wrote:You don't really need to have a different subnet for the bridge, so use the same and see if it works.
Please continue to use the separate dummy subnet.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: Version 1.9.2
Could you please explain to me the problem to use the same subnet?Lantis wrote: This is not the correct way to set up a bridge using relayd
Re: Version 1.9.2
Because that isn't how relayd works.
You need to choose a separate subnet so that it can relay information onto the same subnet.

You need to choose a separate subnet so that it can relay information onto the same subnet.

https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.