A “Linux Embedded Development Environment” (LEDE) fork of the lightweight, router-oriented OpenWrt Linux distribution vows greater transparency and inclusiveness.
Some core developers of the OpenWrt community have forked off the project into a Linux Embedded Development Environment (LEDE) group. LEDE is billed as both a “reboot” and “spinoff” of the lightweight, router-focused distribution, with the objective of building an open source embedded Linux distro that “makes it easy for developers, system administrators or other Linux enthusiasts to build and customize software for embedded devices, especially wireless routers.”
http://hackerboards.com/lede-openwrt-fo ... -openness/
https://www.lede-project.org/
“LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness
Moderator: Moderators
Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness
From a non developer point of view I can see both sides
I myself like the "Steve Jobs" approach,
One man a the top calling the shots.
I've never been into "decisions by committee"
This is a good example of "decision by committee"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Allegro

I myself like the "Steve Jobs" approach,
One man a the top calling the shots.
I've never been into "decisions by committee"
This is a good example of "decision by committee"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Allegro

Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness
I saw this a few days ago.
I feel like it will only hinder the development of both sides.
I feel like it will only hinder the development of both sides.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness
Yeah, Its just the way of lifeLantis wrote:I saw this a few days ago.
I feel like it will only hinder the development of both sides.
People come and go, projects fork, projects are born, and projects die.
That's opensource
Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness
So, no updates to openwrt in ages.
LEDE updated daily by all the familiar openwrt faces.
I'm wondering if we might need to switch repository for DD eventually in Gargoyle 1.11?
LEDE updated daily by all the familiar openwrt faces.
I'm wondering if we might need to switch repository for DD eventually in Gargoyle 1.11?
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness
Yeah, No doubt Eric will make an educated decision
It will be interesting to see what he has to say
I understand in the past he wrote significant code for OpenWRT?
Then decided to start Gargoyle.
It will be interesting to see what he has to say
I understand in the past he wrote significant code for OpenWRT?
Then decided to start Gargoyle.
Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness
Just maybe; it provides the opportunity to resolve the distinction between OpenWrt and Gargoyle. Maybe it is an opportunity to merge with LEDE.
Can you help someone else get Gargoyle up and running?
TL-WDR3600 : Gargoyle 1.9.0 : NBN FixedWireless
TL-WR1043ND-V2 : Gargoyle 1.8.0 : 3G Huawei E160E
TL-WDR3600 : Gargoyle 1.9.0 : NBN FixedWireless
TL-WR1043ND-V2 : Gargoyle 1.8.0 : 3G Huawei E160E
Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.