I just loaded OpenWRT Chaos Calmer 15.05 onto a TP-Link TL-WR1043N/ND v1 and configured only wifi encryption.
Exactly the same thing happens.
Tomorrow, stock firmware . . . stay tuned.
Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
Latest TP-Link stock firmware on a TP-Link TL-WR1043N/ND v1.
An overnight test showed no leakage.
So, to summarize:
- Gargoyle 1.9.x : Leak
- OpenWRT 15.05 : Leak
- TP-Link TL-WR1043ND_V1_140319 : Clean
I'm thinking more in terms of a kernel issue than a missing iptables rule.
I suppose the next step would be to try BarrierBreaker and then possibly a DesignatedDriver snapshot. I can see my router getting bricked this week.
An overnight test showed no leakage.
So, to summarize:
- Gargoyle 1.9.x : Leak
- OpenWRT 15.05 : Leak
- TP-Link TL-WR1043ND_V1_140319 : Clean
I'm thinking more in terms of a kernel issue than a missing iptables rule.
I suppose the next step would be to try BarrierBreaker and then possibly a DesignatedDriver snapshot. I can see my router getting bricked this week.
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
@roadhawk I think that it is worth posting your findings over on the openwrt forum as the solution will need to be identified and resolved in openwrt before Garoyle users can see the fix.
Can you help someone else get Gargoyle up and running?
TL-WDR3600 : Gargoyle 1.9.0 : NBN FixedWireless
TL-WR1043ND-V2 : Gargoyle 1.8.0 : 3G Huawei E160E
TL-WDR3600 : Gargoyle 1.9.0 : NBN FixedWireless
TL-WR1043ND-V2 : Gargoyle 1.8.0 : 3G Huawei E160E
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
OpenWRT BarrierBreaker : Leak
OpenWRT DesignatedDriver : CLEAN
Sorted. So all we have to do is wait.
OpenWRT DesignatedDriver : CLEAN
Sorted. So all we have to do is wait.
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
Interesting.
Most likely to do with a kernel change.
There are rumours that CC 15.05.1 (maintenance update) will be based on Kernel 4.4 (which DD uses).
I think it is more likely that it will use 3.18.27.
For reference, gargoyle uses 3.18.23.
Most likely to do with a kernel change.
There are rumours that CC 15.05.1 (maintenance update) will be based on Kernel 4.4 (which DD uses).
I think it is more likely that it will use 3.18.27.
For reference, gargoyle uses 3.18.23.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
Well, looks like 15.05.1 will have 3.18.23 if I'm reading the OpenWRT front page correctly...?
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
Correct, but since then, the CC branch has been pushed to 3.18.27.
Just isn't part of any official release.
Just isn't part of any official release.
https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
3.18.23 has a bug in witch will put some devices in a bootloop
Linksys WRT3200ACM
NETGEAR Nighthawk R7800
NETGEAR R6260
NETGEAR Nighthawk R7800
NETGEAR R6260