Gargoyle TPLINK WDR4300

Report problems and success stories with Gargoyle on various hardware platforms.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
b0xBR
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:15 pm

Gargoyle TPLINK WDR4300

Post by b0xBR »

Hi!

I'm wondering to install Gargoyle in a WDR4300. First of all, It's an office router, which will work on 24/7. At this moment, it's running the latest original firmware, running ok so far. My question is, should I install? What is the most stable firm version? 1.6.2? 1.7.1? Should I concern about wifi stability?

Thanks in advance.

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6753
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Gargoyle TPLINK WDR4300

Post by Lantis »

1.7.2 is reasonably stable and is the one you should go for in my opinion.

In an office environment it should be fine.
I'd recommend a scheduled reboot once a week just to keep it fresh (something like 3am on a Sunday or whatever time works for your situation).
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

b0xBR
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:15 pm

Re: Gargoyle TPLINK WDR4300

Post by b0xBR »

Dear Lantis.

Thanks for your prompt reply.

What do you think about performance? Does it will reach a bigger wifi range? I'll consider one reboot per week.

Thanks once again.

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6753
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Gargoyle TPLINK WDR4300

Post by Lantis »

Wifi performance should be more or less the same.
It's only added functionality, not really additional physical capability.
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5185
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Gargoyle TPLINK WDR4300

Post by ispyisail »

I have just switched all my production networks to 1.7.2.x

In my opinion this version is very stable

Having said that as a rules of thumb I don't believe the wifi drivers are as stable as OEM ones.

case in point

TP-Link Archer C7 AC1750
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/tp-link/tl-wdr7500
Note: The 802.11ac WLAN↔LAN throughput of Archer C7 2.0 with OpenWrt Chaos Calmer RC3 was measured to be substantially lower than that of the native firmware. (450 to 500Mbps with OpenWrt vs. 750 to 800Mbps with native firmware, both measured under conditions close to ideal). See this thread for details.
its always been this way...................

Post Reply