Hello,
I have a couple of questions, and I couldn't find any answers..so here goes:
1. when should we expect a gargoyle version based on the final version of AA.
2. just so i'm clear, gargoyle is a pretty interface with openwrt behind it ?
I ask because i'm having issues with the PPPOE connection in openwrt, and if its basically the same, then changing from openwrt AA to gargoyle shouldn't make any difference...hope you get my meaning.
Thanks for the help!
Gargoyle and openwrt AA 12.9 FINAL
Moderator: Moderators
- DoesItMatter
- Moderator
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 3:56 pm
Re: Gargoyle and openwrt AA 12.9 FINAL
Yes, Gargoyle is an enhanced GUI interface to OpenWRT underneath
But it's a LOT more, better QoS, TOR (if your router supports it),
other built in features for monitoring, etc.
If you're trying to upgrade to improve your PPPOE - not going to happen
You're better of trying to build OpenWRT trunk releases and test those
But it's a LOT more, better QoS, TOR (if your router supports it),
other built in features for monitoring, etc.
If you're trying to upgrade to improve your PPPOE - not going to happen
You're better of trying to build OpenWRT trunk releases and test those


2x Asus RT-N16 = Asus 3.0.0.4.374.43 Merlin
2x Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH V1 A0D0 = Gargoyle 1.9.x / LEDE 17.01.x
2x Engenius - ESR900 Stock 1.4.0 / OpenWRT Trunk 49400
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 1:47 pm
Re: Gargoyle and openwrt AA 12.9 FINAL
And what about a gargoyle version based on AA 19.9 final ? any ETA ?
Re: Gargoyle and openwrt AA 12.9 FINAL
Gargoyle is a layer on top of OpenWRT but we do patch things from time in OpenWRT itself. PPPoE is just such an example. There is a Gargoyle only patch that fixes an issue with PPPoE not connecting right at boot time. I am not aware of any outstanding bugs in PPPoE in Gargoyle and use it myself.
Regarding AA release dates. There is nothing magical about AA 10.9 Final other than the developers over at OpenWRT made a bunch of builds based on it. If you check their repo you can see that they have applied more fixes in the sources even after their "final release". The next release of Gargoyle is likely to be based on the latest source in their repo and not in the "final release".
There is no schedule other than I saw a comment from Eric that it would be "soon".
You can make your own version based on whatever release of OpenWRT you like by extracting our sources and building on your own box. Not as hard as you might think.
Regarding AA release dates. There is nothing magical about AA 10.9 Final other than the developers over at OpenWRT made a bunch of builds based on it. If you check their repo you can see that they have applied more fixes in the sources even after their "final release". The next release of Gargoyle is likely to be based on the latest source in their repo and not in the "final release".
There is no schedule other than I saw a comment from Eric that it would be "soon".
You can make your own version based on whatever release of OpenWRT you like by extracting our sources and building on your own box. Not as hard as you might think.
Linksys WRT1900ACv2
Netgear WNDR3700v2
TP Link 1043ND v3
TP-Link TL-WDR3600 v1
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2
WRT54G-TM
Netgear WNDR3700v2
TP Link 1043ND v3
TP-Link TL-WDR3600 v1
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2
WRT54G-TM
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 1:47 pm
Re: Gargoyle and openwrt AA 12.9 FINAL
Thank you very much for your reply!
despite what was written earlier in this post, since I switched from AA 12.9 to gargoyle last night,the PPPOE connection is very stable, so i'm really happy.
Will look into that.
despite what was written earlier in this post, since I switched from AA 12.9 to gargoyle last night,the PPPOE connection is very stable, so i'm really happy.
Will look into that.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 10:02 pm
Re: Gargoyle and openwrt AA 12.9 FINAL
Hi, I downloaded the latest gargoyle sdk just now, and want to build a image for my TPLink-741ND router.As I am new to gargoyle, could you give me hints about hwo t o use the gargoyle sdk?
I know make and make ar71xx command, but these took lots of time,
I want to know if there is a method that making image quick and less-time-cost?
I know make and make ar71xx command, but these took lots of time,
I want to know if there is a method that making image quick and less-time-cost?