I had to try one more test with a different router.
Broadcom chipset - Buffalo WHR-G125 - running DD-WRT
Exact same tests as above, with 250MB file
HUGE difference in speed transfer rates / throughput
Only reason I am not running Gargoyle on this router is
because Gargoyle currently doesn't work on this router.
----------------------
Edit:
I found out this router does support Tomato firmware
Flashed latest Tomato 1.25.1719 on the router and ran same test
Looks like Tomato is running the fastest so far.
Gargoyle Raw Performance
Moderator: Moderators
- DoesItMatter
- Moderator
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 3:56 pm
Re: Gargoyle Raw Performance
- Attachments
-
- buffalo-whr-g125-tomato.png (15.44 KiB) Viewed 2104 times
-
- buffalo-whr-g125-dd-wrt.png (15.33 KiB) Viewed 2130 times


2x Asus RT-N16 = Asus 3.0.0.4.374.43 Merlin
2x Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH V1 A0D0 = Gargoyle 1.9.x / LEDE 17.01.x
2x Engenius - ESR900 Stock 1.4.0 / OpenWRT Trunk 49400