1.5.1 has a better QOS than 1.5.2

[jefman]

Good Day

I'm using the both 1.5.1 on the past several weeks with no problems and complains with the user at all. But when version 1.5.2 release, I leave 1.5.1, but couple of days of testing reveal that the QOS of 1.5.1 do most of the job. Because other user complaining about sudden PING spike in their online game. So I decide at this moment to use again version 1.5.1. The only difference is that more restrictions I enable in 1.5.2 than 1.5.1, but now I test 1.5.1 with those restrictions I commit in the 1.5.2 let see if what the best in the QOS.

currently running a internet shop with 10 PC's.

Im using x86 P3 old PC as a Gargoyle Router which overkill as a function of a router

[pbix]

There is almost no differnce in QoS between v1.5.1 & v1.5.2 so it is unlikely that your user complaint is due to that change.

If you will post your QoS configuration and describe your WAN type perhaps we can find the problem there.

[jefman]

Match Criteria Classification
Source Port: 1024-65535 Gaming D
Source Port: 53, Transport Protocol: UDP Gaming D
Transport Protocol: ICMP Gaming D
Source Port: 80, Transport Protocol: TCP, Connection bytes: 350 kBytes flash D
Source Port: 80, Transport Protocol: TCP html D


QoS (Download) -- Service Classes
Service Class Name Percent Bandwidth At Capacity Minimum Bandwidth Maximum Bandwidth Load (kbps)
Gaming D 80% 650 kbit/s unlimited
html D 15% zero unlimited
flash D 5% zero unlimited
Total Download Bandwidth: 2600 kbit/s

Im with 3000 MBits at no load at midnight at speedtest.net
Im only post for QOS download


But when im using 1.5.1 they're no complain for the stability


Thanks

[DoesItMatter]

Im with 3000 MBits at no load at midnight at speedtest.net
Im only post for QOS download

Thanks

3000 Mbit line? That' can't be right.

If that were the case, you could just have 100mbit adapters
in 30 PC's and never have to use QoS (since you're not using wireless)

Are you sure its not 3Mbit? or 30Mbit?

[jefman]

AHh sorry its only about 3Mbit. sorry for mistake..

[pbix]

You should post both upload and download QoS as well as your connection->basic screen as I asked previously.

I recommend that you use IP addresses if possible to classify traffic. It is more reliable. Also check you connections page and make sure the connections are being properly classified.

Finally, what game are you playing that needs 850kbps download?

[jefman]

Thanks pbix for your help and efforts..

I've found out that 1.4.2 QOS suits my needs and does what I expected.


GOD BLESS!! thanks for making gargoyle QOS