applied new codes (
https://github.com/ericpaulbishop/gargo ... /680/files) and tried the following setup, is the behavior to be expected?
files with new codes applied:
/etc/init.d/samba
/etc/samba/smb.conf.template
setup: -
_________usr1_______usr2_______usr3
share1____rw
share2____rw_________ro
share3____rw________________anonymous,ro
a) removed windows credentials, reboot pc and router. both share1 and share2 prompted for usr/pwd, while share3 offered instant anonymous access. perfect.
b) selected share2 and enter usr2's read only pwd, share2 granted ro access which is good; but share1 won't allow access despite entering the correct usr1's pwd, and share3 also denied anonymous access.
c) ran windows cmd 'net use * /delete', took ~10sec to settle and to regain share3 anonymous access, and the pwd prompts for share1/2. looks good.
d) selected share1 and entered usr1's rw pwd, access granted to all shares as expected.
I can get around b), by defining an alternative route \\192.168.1.1\share1, when \\GARGOYLE\share2 is active.