“LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness

General discussion about Gargoyle, OpenWrt or anything else even remotely related to the project

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5185
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand

“LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness

Post by ispyisail »

A “Linux Embedded Development Environment” (LEDE) fork of the lightweight, router-oriented OpenWrt Linux distribution vows greater transparency and inclusiveness.

Some core developers of the OpenWrt community have forked off the project into a Linux Embedded Development Environment (LEDE) group. LEDE is billed as both a “reboot” and “spinoff” of the lightweight, router-focused distribution, with the objective of building an open source embedded Linux distro that “makes it easy for developers, system administrators or other Linux enthusiasts to build and customize software for embedded devices, especially wireless routers.”

http://hackerboards.com/lede-openwrt-fo ... -openness/


https://www.lede-project.org/

ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5185
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness

Post by ispyisail »

From a non developer point of view I can see both sides

I myself like the "Steve Jobs" approach,

One man a the top calling the shots.

I've never been into "decisions by committee"

This is a good example of "decision by committee"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Allegro

Image

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6753
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness

Post by Lantis »

I saw this a few days ago.
I feel like it will only hinder the development of both sides.
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5185
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness

Post by ispyisail »

Lantis wrote:I saw this a few days ago.
I feel like it will only hinder the development of both sides.
Yeah, Its just the way of life

People come and go, projects fork, projects are born, and projects die.

That's opensource

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6753
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness

Post by Lantis »

So, no updates to openwrt in ages.
LEDE updated daily by all the familiar openwrt faces.

I'm wondering if we might need to switch repository for DD eventually in Gargoyle 1.11?
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

ispyisail
Moderator
Posts: 5185
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:15 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness

Post by ispyisail »

Yeah, No doubt Eric will make an educated decision

It will be interesting to see what he has to say

I understand in the past he wrote significant code for OpenWRT?

Then decided to start Gargoyle.

nworbnhoj
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:08 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness

Post by nworbnhoj »

Just maybe; it provides the opportunity to resolve the distinction between OpenWrt and Gargoyle. Maybe it is an opportunity to merge with LEDE.
Can you help someone else get Gargoyle up and running?
TL-WDR3600 : Gargoyle 1.9.0 : NBN FixedWireless
TL-WR1043ND-V2 : Gargoyle 1.8.0 : 3G Huawei E160E

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6753
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: “LEDE” OpenWrt fork promises greater openness

Post by Lantis »

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/le ... 04786.html

Looks like a remerge is finally in works.
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

Post Reply