Gargoyle Forum

Yes, but mostly no. More possible in 1.14 than in previous versions (due to the switch from IMQ to IFB). That being said: - you would have no GUI (without rewriting it) - the script would need modification to suit a lack of Gargoyle specific firewall chains/tables - for latest openwrt it would need ...

I can’t really recall how it works on 1.12, but I suspect a stale ARP cache
cat /proc/net/arp

So was it in either of those files when you got it to appear again?
And, what version are you running.

It comes from several places
/tmp/dhcp.leases
/tmp/dhcpv4configleases.gargoyle

Is the ghost entry in one of those?

Correct, https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/11077 Although there are several issues that have different information about the same thing, no real consolidated issue tracking it. My understanding of the issue is that all traffic is broadcast onto all switch ports, which can cause a leakage of ...

There are newer versions available for you to download.
Your device has undergone a large change so it would be worth reading a little before doing any updates to understand ar71xx vs ath79 upgrading.

Check out the “built” folder in the root directory

You can self host them if you like using a web server. Or you can latch onto mine. https://lantisproject.com/gargoyle_custom/1.15.x_2203_test_builds/x86/ Just pick the two folders that are relevant to you. Assuming x64 and x64_kernelspecific. Of course my repo won’t have the extra wifi modules you’v...

1.13 (latest, not the release from several years ago) would be best.
There will be no 1.14 for that device. It will hopefully return in 1.15 as the upstream issue has been resolved.

Via the CLI, yes. There’s no technical limitation there.