Search found 84 matches
- Mon Oct 05, 2015 11:34 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: gargoyle-ispy 2015-October-01 07:49.torrent
- Replies: 37
- Views: 34506
Re: upnp networx monitoring not working?
Hi, Recently upgraded finding out that this is based on CC. ON wndr3800ch, with no big issues. However now networx does not work with this through upnp, despite upnp ports working fine to map. I see gargoyle router in gateway name, but nothing in wan interface. I tried the fix described in past vers...
- Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:05 pm
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: WAN IP changes
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9777
Re: WAN IP changes
If you connect a laptop or desktop directly, do you get a 178 or 10. address? If 178 maybe try this on the laptop before connecting the gargoyle router: open command prompt as admin ipconfig /release Unplug laptop and plug the gargoyle router in. I've had issues with my ISP giving odd IP addresses d...
- Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:46 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: gargoyle-ispy 2015-June-05 02:07.torrent
- Replies: 22
- Views: 21444
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-June-05 02:07.torrent
Any way to read the upnp variable in order to use a cron to restart the service if the data gets up high enough to kill reporting?
- Fri Mar 20, 2015 9:22 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: gargoyle and fq_codel
- Replies: 13
- Views: 16743
Re: gargoyle and fq_codel
It gives a codel queue for the interfaces themselves, not touching the QOS queues. My friend has 150 mbit fiber, so he doesn't use qos. But if he leaves stock queues (fifo?) he can get spikes to 200 ms. With codel, the latency never goes above 120ms. It's just smarter about how it handles traffic, e...
- Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:19 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Will QoS still function with bwmon disable?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4173
Re: Will QoS still function with bwmon disable?
You don't need bwmon... I always disable it and chmod -x it to be sure.
- Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:10 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: gargoyle and fq_codel
- Replies: 13
- Views: 16743
Re: gargoyle and fq_codel
You can't use codel for the qos in gargoyle, but hsfc/ sfq is much better because like mentioned, you can use caps. sqm_scripts was not too good in balancing out load- like torrents would still saturate the connection because of many multiple connections! But you can change the eth0 eth1 wlan1 wlan0...
- Mon Mar 09, 2015 12:26 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Howto: Fios with 2 routers for qos functionality and speed.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3458
Re: Howto: Fios with 2 routers for qos functionality and spe
I've since changed my setup. Now, gargoyle is used to do download QOS, as it's much better in sharing bandwith, limiting torrents, and keeping ping low than the old school QOS of the actiontec rev. I. The actiontec is still handling upload QOS though because gargoyle or openwrt on 800 mhz overclocke...
- Mon Mar 09, 2015 12:23 am
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Quotas bug
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5641
Re: Quotas bug
Any idea if this was fixed in the newer build?
I see something regarding iptables on github late Feb, but not sure... I could care less about the guest networks- so I'd rather not recompile if not needed
I see something regarding iptables on github late Feb, but not sure... I could care less about the guest networks- so I'd rather not recompile if not needed
- Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:18 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Upload QoS Working. But Ping HIGH
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3855
Re: Upload QoS Working. But Ping HIGH
You need to lower your upload limit a bit more. Some lines need more "space" to do this. Also set a rule in upload (and download) to prioritize packets less than 86 bytes or so. That helps ack/ping/etc
- Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:51 am
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Quotas bug
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5641
Re: Quotas bug
The only workaround is a bit hacky: Set a rule in download qos for that ip range using a subnet in cidr notation (eg: 192.168.1.128/26). The quotas are easier because they can take ip ranges, where qos tab cannot. Another unrelated issue is with dnscrypt-proxy http://wiki.openwrt.org/inbox/dnscrypt ...