Search found 124 matches
- Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:32 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Ability to see more than 100% usage in Bandwidth Quota Usage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10481
Re: Ability to see more than 100% usage in Bandwidth Quota Usage
Just seen such situation a few days ago and thought the same!
- Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:05 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: 1.10.x Final
- Replies: 30
- Views: 116862
Re: 1.10.x Final
If your router is supported (has 8MB or more) you should upgrade to 1.11 that is available in download section.
1.11 based on much more recent OpenWRT with many security fixes.
1.11 based on much more recent OpenWRT with many security fixes.
- Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:13 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
- Replies: 29
- Views: 24896
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
Sure. I was ready to reconfigure from scratch. Tried as I was on quite recent 1.11.x build (your Dec 11 build that is after RC5).
- Fri Feb 22, 2019 3:47 am
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
- Replies: 29
- Views: 24896
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
Installed 1.11 (preserving settings) and high res graphs works fine. Do not know what I could do wrong last time.
- Thu Feb 21, 2019 5:05 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Version 1.11.0 : Based on OpenWrt 18.06
- Replies: 177
- Views: 479136
Re: Version 1.11.0 : Based on OpenWrt 18.06
THANK YOU! You are awesome!
- Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:22 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
- Replies: 29
- Views: 24896
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
Sorry for late reply, I was out of home.
I did tried to wait as well as toggled the checkbox on and off a few times. Waited a few minutes after toggling it. Did not help and the issue was even when the checkbox is not ticked.
Probably someone else should test it as well with not preserving settings.
I did tried to wait as well as toggled the checkbox on and off a few times. Waited a few minutes after toggling it. Did not help and the issue was even when the checkbox is not ticked.
Probably someone else should test it as well with not preserving settings.
- Thu Feb 14, 2019 4:25 am
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
- Replies: 29
- Views: 24896
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
I was not able to select anything in host/ip dropdown after the update. It is instantly reset to the router/ip even if the checkbox was not ticked.
P.S. I preserved settings so this might be an issue. Sorry, I do not have time to reconfigure everything from the scratch today.
P.S. I preserved settings so this might be an issue. Sorry, I do not have time to reconfigure everything from the scratch today.
- Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:47 am
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
- Replies: 29
- Views: 24896
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
Switched on the high res checkbox. Have not noticed any differences in dropdowns straight away. Will them check again tomorrow. Update: as soon as I posted the message above (less than 5 minutes passed since I ticked the checkbox), all three dropdowns disappeared. Unticked the checkbox and the issue...
- Tue Feb 12, 2019 10:37 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
- Replies: 29
- Views: 24896
Re: high resolution graphs and hostname/ip
I do remember that I used to have issues when I ticked the high resolution checkbox on my WRT1200AC. So I never switching it ON since then.
Currently on 1.11 RC5 (or ispy's build, do not remember exectly) so I can test it if no re-configuring from the scratch required.
Currently on 1.11 RC5 (or ispy's build, do not remember exectly) so I can test it if no re-configuring from the scratch required.
- Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:51 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5
- Replies: 211
- Views: 201194
Re: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5
> Shouldn't it take the 193.168.1.33-193.168.1.62 range for DHCP?
Nope (if I understand correctly).
224 = b11100000
So you have b11111 = 31 addresses from b00000 (0, reserved) to b11111 (31)
Nope (if I understand correctly).
224 = b11100000
So you have b11111 = 31 addresses from b00000 (0, reserved) to b11111 (31)