It looks like a few of the images are corrupt.. sorry about that.
I'm looking into what caused that and fixing it now.
Search found 1443 matches
- Thu Jul 07, 2016 12:53 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Version 1.9.1
- Replies: 192
- Views: 388320
- Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:08 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Version 1.9.1
- Replies: 192
- Views: 388320
Version 1.9.1
New in 1.9.1: New rampis architecture is supported Handle wireless AC routers properly Allow SSH access using public key authentication Quota usage table can be displayed by percentage or usage, with colors Fixes guest access in Samba & preserve Samba passwords through upgrade Fixes guest networ...
- Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:54 pm
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 14592
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
Before digging too much further here, I think it's important to look at the behavior of other routers. It's true, I'm not sure where that information would be stored or how it would be captured in a NATed connection, but I'd like to verify that this doesn't happen with either a default/vanilla insta...
- Wed Mar 09, 2016 1:02 am
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 14592
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
Hmm.. I don't see that as something that is a security issue, but it just shouldn't be happening. NAT should prevent the addresses from being visible there, because they are literally over-written in the connection when they are NATed. I'm confused how there is any sort of connection at all in that ...
- Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:21 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: new Build
- Replies: 63
- Views: 64438
Re: new Build
I figured out why mvebu isn't building and fixed it, but I'm still trying to figure out why you're having trouble with the ar71xx target.
If you just try doing an ar71xx build what errors are you seeing? I'm having trouble trying to replicate the problems you're seeing there.
If you just try doing an ar71xx build what errors are you seeing? I'm having trouble trying to replicate the problems you're seeing there.
- Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:00 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: new Build
- Replies: 63
- Views: 64438
Re: new Build
Try it now.
For some reason I could never get it to fail (I tried it again), but I found a missing config option that should be there that lines up with the errors you report, and I updated the config file for the mvebu target accordingly.
For some reason I could never get it to fail (I tried it again), but I found a missing config option that should be there that lines up with the errors you report, and I updated the config file for the mvebu target accordingly.
- Wed Mar 02, 2016 2:33 pm
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: The Bleeding Edge
- Replies: 44
- Views: 51417
Re: The Bleeding Edge
FYI, I've merged the known-devices pull request into a separate branch and am testing that now, just like I did for table sorting a few days ago. Because of it's larger size this may take me a bit longer to evaluate, but it should be merged into master before too long.
- Wed Mar 02, 2016 2:22 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: new Build
- Replies: 63
- Views: 64438
Re: new Build
It's crashing for you on the mvebu target, which I managed to build successfully.
It's true, I didn't try the alix or atheros builds with the latest code yet.
It's true, I didn't try the alix or atheros builds with the latest code yet.
- Mon Feb 29, 2016 5:50 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: new Build
- Replies: 63
- Views: 64438
Re: new Build
I just did a clean build (starting from a fresh checkout) and couldn't reproduce this error.
Is anyone else experiencing trouble compiling the source in its present state?
Is anyone else experiencing trouble compiling the source in its present state?
- Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:13 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: Apple vs FBI
- Replies: 9
- Views: 44777
Re: Apple vs FBI
Yeah, Apple are the good guys here, no question about it. It's true, Gargoyle has the capacity to control/monitor/restrict users but in my mind it's very, very different when a parent wants to monitor their kid, or a business wants wants to monitor their employees while at work on the internet conne...