Gargoyle Forum

Your router is different, in the c7 radio0 is 5G. Inspecting your code i can see you setup 2 guest networks over 2.4G. Now i get what you said. You didn't split the ip range in groups. Just created the networks and were able to connect to them. I'll try the same. My first instinct is that you've mad...

Well, what you see is what i did. I already posted the steps i followed that lead me to an unsuccesful result. I'm unsure whether what you did is the same i'm trying to. If so, could you post the steps you followed so that i can try to replicate?

Does anyone know whether this router has ever worked this way? I may consider getting other if necessary, this fature was one of the reasons i got it.

I had "wlan1-1" for 2.4G guest network.

So i updated that line accordingly but there was no difference. Ips still aren't being assigned.

Hi, i just tried for the third time, i did the following: -in wireless "config wifi-iface 'ap_gn_g'", edited: option network 'Guest' option macaddr 'x2:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx' -in network, added: config interface 'Guest' option _orig_ifname 'wlan0-1' option _orig_bridge 'false' option proto 'stati...

I remember not knowing what that MAC address for the guest network was for. I think I'll try it again on monday. So any valid address will do?

Do you mean theorically, or have you tried it recently, because I already tried that and did not work.

I tried last year: https://www.gargoyle-router.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=10121 I wanted to give it another try today with a different approach. Create the networks in the GUI, so that boileplate wifi code for archer c7 was generated, and then tweak the code. But no luck, this time the devic...

But isn't it a bug? has it been reported before? when it's download time you love it, but you want to browse simultaneously you hate it.

On fresh 1.9.2 on archer c7 v2. When i download wirelessly a long file from a server with high speed, i get max speed, but there is no bandwith for other devices. Effectively no internet.

I suppose it can be somehow be fixed with qos, but is this expected? It happened on 1.9.1 as well.