Search found 6764 matches
- Mon Apr 29, 2024 6:12 am
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: showing a red light
- Replies: 3
- Views: 154
Re: showing a red light
Significantly more details required please.
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 7:23 am
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: Gargoyle for cpe220 v3, cpe210 v3.2 and wr840n v6.2
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5679
Re: Gargoyle for cpe220 v3, cpe210 v3.2 and wr840n v6.2
No time like the present to learn, as they say.
- Tue Apr 16, 2024 5:55 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Gargoyle's BWmon in native OpenWrt?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4902
Re: Gargoyle's BWmon in native OpenWrt?
The bandwidth monitoring is powered by a custom kernel module which would need to be patched into the OpenWrt build environment. OpenWrt (many, many years ago) were not interested in accepting such a thing. Problem 2, it only works with iptables. OpenWrt are migrated to nftables. Once you have the k...
- Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:51 am
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: Gargoyle for cpe220 v3, cpe210 v3.2 and wr840n v6.2
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5679
Re: Gargoyle for cpe220 v3, cpe210 v3.2 and wr840n v6.2
https://github.com/ericpaulbishop/gargoyle/blob/master/README.md The fastest method is to compile ath79.default to check your build environment works. Then modify targets/ath79/profiles/default/config to enable your device to build. Adding it to targets/ath79/profiles/default/profile_images is helpf...
- Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:47 am
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: Gargoyle for cpe220 v3, cpe210 v3.2 and wr840n v6.2
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5679
Re: Gargoyle for cpe220 v3, cpe210 v3.2 and wr840n v6.2
wr840n v6.2, no due to the low flash storage.
The two cpe devices, potentially, however currently Gargoyle is not compiled for these versions and would require you to compile them yourself, test, and if it works ok I’d be happy to add them to the official build.
The two cpe devices, potentially, however currently Gargoyle is not compiled for these versions and would require you to compile them yourself, test, and if it works ok I’d be happy to add them to the official build.
- Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:19 am
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
- Replies: 25
- Views: 13660
Re: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
An excellent suggestion!
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:50 pm
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
- Replies: 25
- Views: 13660
Re: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
I don’t really have any further suggestions. Except to try vanilla OpenWrt 23.05 and see if you have the same issue. If not then a comparison between config with 1.15 might reveal something.
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 9:36 am
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
- Replies: 25
- Views: 13660
Re: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
Compile a list of allowed symbols.
Your DHCP settings sound odd to me, what IP is the router? It is weird that your DHCP range starts at 1.
Your DHCP settings sound odd to me, what IP is the router? It is weird that your DHCP range starts at 1.
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:22 am
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
- Replies: 25
- Views: 13660
Re: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
Don’t use symbols or spaces at all, that is safest.
I don’t have an audit of where symbols are safe or not. The community could compile one
I don’t have an audit of where symbols are safe or not. The community could compile one
- Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:27 pm
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
- Replies: 25
- Views: 13660
Re: Wifi 2.4ghz mode, only G+N or N, c2600 and r7800
You can try it and see if it improves the behaviour, but in theory it shouldn’t.
ESP devices are notorious for having shoddy wifi though…
The only other suggestion would be to try without SAE/WPA3, i.e. use WPA2 only, if you aren’t already.
ESP devices are notorious for having shoddy wifi though…
The only other suggestion would be to try without SAE/WPA3, i.e. use WPA2 only, if you aren’t already.