Search found 47 matches
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:01 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: QoS the next generation
- Replies: 48
- Views: 60645
Re: QoS the next generation
State: FREE Link limit: 460 (kbps) Fair Link limit: 414 (kbps) Link load: 456 (kbps) Ping: off Filtered ping: 16 (ms) Ping time limit: 43 (ms) Classes Active: 1 ID FFFF, Active 0, Backlog 0, BW bps (filtered): 0 ID 8003, Active 0, Backlog 0, BW bps (filtered): 0 ID 8004, Active 1, Backlog 4, BW bps...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:50 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: QoS the next generation
- Replies: 48
- Views: 60645
Re: QoS the next generation
Even with the http download stopped with the torrent download now hogging the whole bandwidth, still qosmon.status doesn't reflect the change: State: FREE Link limit: 460 (kbps) Fair Link limit: 414 (kbps) Link load: 402 (kbps) Ping: off Filtered ping: 18 (ms) Ping time limit: 46 (ms) Classes Active...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:18 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: QoS the next generation
- Replies: 48
- Views: 60645
Re: QoS the next generation
Yep. What qosmon.status reports is contradictory to how my programs perform during actual downloads. Even when setting download bandwidth _way below_ the normal, ensuring that QoS will trigger, still the bandwidth limits are not being respected. I set each class service to provide 4 kbps as minimum ...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:12 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: QoS the next generation
- Replies: 48
- Views: 60645
Re: QoS the next generation
Thanks for the quick fix. Actually I edited my post to state that the reboot time is longer than normal, boot up time is normal. Once openwrt is running, then I ssh into the router and issue a reboot command, it takes several seconds more than it normally would before the router goes into reboot. I ...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:30 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: QoS the next generation
- Replies: 48
- Views: 60645
Re: QoS the next generation
My qosmon.status logs: State: FREE Link limit: 384 (kbps) Fair Link limit: 345 (kbps) Link load: 300 (kbps) Ping: off Filtered ping: 21 (ms) Ping time limit: 52 (ms) Classes Active: 1 ID FFFF, Active 0, Backlog 0, BW bps (filtered): 0 ID 8032, Active 0, Backlog 0, BW bps (filtered): 0 ID 8033, Activ...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:29 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: QoS the next generation
- Replies: 48
- Views: 60645
Re: QoS the next generation
Some observations: Before I had qos upload enabled, my upload speed result in speedtest.net averages around 190 kbps. So I used this to set qos upload bandwidth as 190 * 95% = 180 kbps. After saving changes, I retest again but this time my average upload speed is now around 45-60 kbps. There are no ...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:55 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: QoS the next generation
- Replies: 48
- Views: 60645
Re: QoS the next generation
Hi pbix, I'm trying to setup my qos rules to test out this new implementation and I noticed an annoying bug. I have setup two rules as follows Qos UP: Rule 1: Dest Port: 53 Max Pktlen: 512 Rule 2: Src Port: 1025-65535 Dest Port: 1025-65535 Min Pktlen: 400 Qos DOWN: Rule 1: Src Port: 53 Max Pktlen: 5...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:14 am
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: Bug reports on 1.3.3 and feature requests
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6769
Re: Bug reports on 1.3.3 and feature requests
UPDATE DHCP Issue: Changed 11 hours ago by jow Correction of the statement above: "Start" is the offset from the network address and specifies the minimum allowed IP "Limit" is the offset from the minimum IP specifying the highest allowable IP Therefore there _is_ an issue, rathe...
- Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:44 pm
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: Bug reports on 1.3.3 and feature requests
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6769
Re: Bug reports on 1.3.3 and feature requests
Feature Requests: 3. I think it makes a lot more sense to link to a domain in question than a report on the visitors/geolocation of the domain. The former will likely give you a clue as to what it might be about, while the latter will not. You'll note if you follow your link that I will learn where...
- Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:43 pm
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: Bug reports on 1.3.3 and feature requests
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6769
Re: Bug reports on 1.3.3 and feature requests
Thank you for your support and explanations. However, regarding the DHCP issue I guess I got the whole thing reversed. The OpenWRT documentation description of this option is inaccurate. Here's why: Here's an excerpt of my dhcp config: config 'dhcp' 'lan' option 'interface' 'lan' option 'start' '100...