Gargoyle Forum

The "route subnet behind client is working fine, no problem there. however i can not use that since all my clients are identical on lan side. thats why i need the NAT function to forward incoming from tun0 same way as it does from eth1 or wan.

This is the architecture i have chosen. gargoyile with openvpn is brilliant for this setup, only i cant figure out a way to access the forwarded ports coming from the vpn subnet

figured out a way to add pictures. here is some of my config

as reference to your picture (that i cant figure out how to upload) the text says "This is a better set up" That is exactly how it is set up. All my clients connect to my server through the internet as you have depicted. problem i have is that im unable to access the services via nat on cl...

on the client here is what i get by typing iptables -t nat -L -n -v Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 1798 packets, 125K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 1804 126K delegate_prerouting all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 99 packets, 5936 bytes) pkts byte...

unable to upload picture, quota issue. will try to paint a picture with words :-) 1. gargoyle router running openvpn server wan, static public ip, unike subnet on lan 2. multiple gargoyle routers running openvpn client, all with same subnet on lan side for homogenius architecture. all have port forw...

i have a bit of a pickle in this same category. i have a gargoyle router running openvpn as shown above and i have multiple clients connected to it. all my clients have identical subnet on the lan side, so i can not use the route lan function. what i want to use is the port forwarding instead, that ...

Hi, i have set up a network running openvpn server and openvpn clients. all my clients are running same subnet on lan side, so only option i have is to use port forwarding. on the clients i have several devices on the lan side i want to access. so far i have not been able to access the forwarded por...