Gargoyle Forum

Thanks. Entered "router" in device type, "available" in availability, "ac" in wlan 5GHz and "2" in CPU cores to reduce the list: https://openwrt.org/toh/views/toh_extended_all?dataflt[WLAN+5.0GHz*~]=ac&dataflt[Availability*~]=available&dataflt[CPU+core...

WRT32X should be good, however it is overkill for me.
I'm trying to find other options in WRT1200AC price range.

I'm using TP-Link C7 v2 with Gargoyle (1.9x - 1.10.x) for quite a while. Happy customer :) After upgrading my connection to 50/20 I've found that the router cannot utilize my connection with both QoS & BW monitoring enabled (I use QoS and do not want to disable BW Mon as sometimes it is handy). ...

I'm also using 1.10 on C7 v2.
Port forwarding working fine in my case.

I thought that CPU load value is measured in ... percents %-)
As a result, I never really looked at these low numbers.
Thanks to this discussion, now I'm aware.

P.S. It would be nice if CPU load values higher than 0.8 (for example) are displayed in red.

May be he's traveling with speed = ~0.99c so time is much slower for him
Anyway, it is impressive...

I tried to preserve my bw data this way when upgraded from 1.9.2 to 1.10. Unfortunately, it was not displayed. I do not know why.
In my case the data was not very important so I even have not tried to investigate.

You may want to check this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=11318

In my case there is even no timezone's difference.
When restarted uptimes are zeroed and then system uptime may be one minute ahead of pppoe uptime.

P.S. I'm on 1.10, using UTC+10 AU, QLD time server

How about posting some screenshots?