Search found 18 matches

by eierfrucht
Mon Aug 01, 2016 6:23 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Settings location
Replies: 4
Views: 3927

Settings location

Dear sirs! I would love to migrate from 1.6.X to 1.9.1 on a number of routers in my building; however, it's vital that DHCP / FIREWALL / MAC FILTER / QOS rules be preserved (dozens of them) I don't think it's possible by checking "Try to preserve settings" before the upgrade process, so th...
by eierfrucht
Fri Apr 17, 2015 3:57 pm
Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
Topic: Feature Request: Linked Upload and Download
Replies: 5
Views: 4102

Re: Feature Request: Linked Upload and Download

I used to set my downlink cap at 80 Mbps, which gave me a link limit of 72 Mbps in ACC. Whenever I started a bunch of torrents, the outgoing traffic started to stiffle the incoming traffic. ACC would react by slowly reducing the downlink limit to 57-60 Mbps (over a period of two or three minutes) bu...
by eierfrucht
Sun Apr 12, 2015 7:34 am
Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
Topic: Feature Request: Linked Upload and Download
Replies: 5
Views: 4102

Re: Feature Request: Linked Upload and Download

ACC is too slow to react. A sudden upload burst while downloading at maximum speed literally cripples QoS. ACC can only slowly adjust the link speed, it can't handle sudden upload bursts and it takes too long for ACC to throttle down the link even if the upstream traffic is more or less persistent. ...
by eierfrucht
Sat Apr 11, 2015 7:46 pm
Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
Topic: Feature Request: Linked Upload and Download
Replies: 5
Views: 4102

Feature Request: Linked Upload and Download

My ISP enforces a total bandwidth cap of 80 Mbps on Upload & Download combined, for QoS and ACC to work I had to cap Download at 60 Mbps and Upload at 20 Mpbs. Are there any plans for adding some flexible support for this kind of ISP bandwidth capping? Many ISPs in Western Europe employ this ki...
by eierfrucht
Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:55 am
Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
Topic: Graceful way to split Dual Access traffic?
Replies: 6
Views: 7044

Re: Graceful way to split Dual Access traffic?

Well, I was able to create a secondary VLAN on my RT-N16 and assign it the same subnet as Gargoyle's LAN. Then I cross-cabled the both and now it works as a kind of multi-WAN for Gargoyle (by default different VLANs on Shibby's TomatoUSB communicate between each other freely) Quite expectedly, QoS o...
by eierfrucht
Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:13 pm
Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
Topic: Graceful way to split Dual Access traffic?
Replies: 6
Views: 7044

Re: Graceful way to split Dual Access traffic?

This question should probably have been asked in the first place, but better late than never... is it possible to make one of Gargoyle's LAN ports into a second WAN with a different WAN IP, then head all 10.0.0.0/8 traffic through this second WAN? If possible, I'll just filter all such traffic on R...
by eierfrucht
Tue Nov 05, 2013 7:46 am
Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
Topic: Graceful way to split Dual Access traffic?
Replies: 6
Views: 7044

Re: Graceful way to split Dual Access traffic?

So, there seems to be no way to make QoS work with a specified downlink of 100 Mbps when the 40 Mbps L2TP tunnel on the outer router becomes overloaded, but there still remains 60 Mbps or so of unused MAN bandwidth? (Provided that I can easily capture MAN traffic in a class of its own by adding a &q...
by eierfrucht
Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:14 pm
Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
Topic: Graceful way to split Dual Access traffic?
Replies: 6
Views: 7044

Graceful way to split Dual Access traffic?

Hi! I'm running an Asus RT-N16 with custom firmware as a kind of L2TP modem (takes LOTS of CPU power to sustain a 40 Mbps L2TP tunnel at top load), one of its LAN ports bridged with the WAN port of my home gateway, TP-LINK 1043ND running Gargoyle 1.5.11. My ISP down / up speeds have been perfectly s...