Gargoyle Forum

As a workaround, the first thing to try would be setting up the ping watchdog to run every couple minutes and issue the command 'wifi" upon failure to reach the main AP.


Regards
Ektus.

About the "crash", all my devices lose internet suddently, it's impossible to reach anything (websites, Facebook, Whatsapp, etc.), moreover Wi-Fi connection icons gets an alert signal, indicating that no Internet connection is detected. So, I need to reboot my router (using GUI Gargoyle) ...

ok ntfs is not so good for gargoyle. is fat32 supported and better than ntfs? or what else than windows can manage? Take ext2. There are drivers for Windows to read and write, e.g. https://www.heise.de/download/product/ext2-installable-file-system-25216 Fat32 is limited in file size (max. 2 (or 4?)...

Well I'll try it , but i am going to uprade to newer TP-Link router with at least 1 usb port and 5Ghz wifi .Used C5 model is on my top list for now about 80 usd cost , is this a good choice ? It may be, if it's a supported version. Version 1.2 is, version 2.0 is not. There's limited support in Lede...

What are the exact steps to reproduce? Do you need to be connected first? Is it a rescan only? - connected via DHCP wireless (that's the normal mode of operation of this production router) - "SCAN" to populate the list (without, only the connected SSID is visible, no list - newly created ...

I can’t reproduce this. I can. After running a scan, there are multiple duplicate entries in the list. The list currently has 48 entries (including "other"), while spectrum analyser shows a total 10 networks in the 2.4GHz band. I can provide a screenshot and correspondimg "iw wlan1 s...

iperf testing, setup: iperf client: Windows 7 X64, Gigabit Ethernet connection gigabit-switch Archer C7 V2 LAN <-> WAN running Gargoyle 1.10.0 iperf server: Fritz!Box 7490 iperf.exe -c 192.168.1.9 -p 4711 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.9, ...

One of my routers has reached 728 days. It's running as a dumb switch and AP-client to wirelessly connect a remote part of the local network.

I tested the exact same settings and it behaved as expected. Is your client misbehaving? I don't know, but with three different clients (Win XP, Win 7 and Android)? Unlikely. Has there been an update of the kernel or smb module, perhaps trying to enforce password protection and/or encryption? There...

Old thread, current problem: I want to block UDP access to two distinct external ports while allowing everything else for one device on my network. Is there a way to achieve this with the GUI? I've seen the device contacting at least 30 different external IPs, so adding all of them would be cumberso...