Search found 23 matches

by cn008
Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:55 pm
Forum: Gargoyle Development
Topic: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?
Replies: 20
Views: 19777

Re: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?

Hi just checking on status of Gargoyle for C2600? I tried the parent control on stock firmware, and it can only be applied on individual devices, ie, I have to add a device, then blacklist some website, which is not really good to use. This method does not work well when I have my kids as standard u...
by cn008
Sat Mar 24, 2018 8:42 pm
Forum: Gargoyle Development
Topic: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?
Replies: 20
Views: 19777

Re: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?

I enabled QOS on my c2600 and it is a little better. I then tried with my tp link 841 which has Gargoyle v1.6.2 installed, I only get 66MB/S download speed even though I have 500u, but bufferbloat is A+, so it seems Gargoyle is much better on this. The 66MB/S speed probably is limited by the LAN por...
by cn008
Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:57 am
Forum: Gargoyle Development
Topic: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?
Replies: 20
Views: 19777

Re: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?

I just upgraded to Roger 500u and did a speed test, huge bufferbloat(above 200ms) so the quality & bufferbloat & overrall are all C.

I am using stock firmware on my c2600. (Tried using rogers modem+router and same result).

Will Gargoyle provide better performance?

Thanks.
by cn008
Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:02 am
Forum: Gargoyle Development
Topic: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?
Replies: 20
Views: 19777

Re: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?

Thank you! It is good to know it is being actively worked on. I uninstalled LEDE from my c2600 and reverted to stock firmware. LEDE is a little difficult to use for a regular user, eg, installing packages to monitor bandwidth usage, USB support, etc. BTW, TP-Link has an app(Tether) which can be inst...
by cn008
Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:40 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: TP Link C2600
Replies: 6
Views: 2465

Re: TP Link C2600

I just posed a reply to this https://www.gargoyle-router.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=10938&p=47698#p47698 I installed LEDE 17.01.4 on my c2600 and it is not fun. I had to install other packages like bandwidthd, samba etc. And still trying to make samba to work. It would be great if we get ...
by cn008
Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:38 pm
Forum: Gargoyle Development
Topic: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?
Replies: 20
Views: 19777

Re: Will Archer C2600 be supported? Will gargoyle use lede?

I installed LEDE 17.01.4 on my c2600 and it is not fun.
I had to install other packages like bandwidthd, samba etc.
And still trying to make samba to work.

It would be great if we get a gargoyle version with those feature/packages included.
by cn008
Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:57 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: TP Link C2600
Replies: 6
Views: 2465

Re: TP Link C2600

Thanks! I understand now.
Hopefully this will be supported someday soon.
by cn008
Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:15 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: TP Link C2600
Replies: 6
Views: 2465

Re: TP Link C2600

It should be supported by openWrt?
A lot of users alreadying using it:

https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=54973

And here is the latest version:
http://dl.eko.one.pl/luci/lede/snapshot ... actory.bin
http://dl.eko.one.pl/luci/lede/snapshot ... pgrade.bin

I do not need a lot of fancy stuff, and I liked gargoyle on my tp link 841.

Thanks!
by cn008
Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:02 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: TP Link C2600
Replies: 6
Views: 2465

TP Link C2600

Hi is there a plan to provide support for tp link c2600?
Thanks.
by cn008
Fri Jul 01, 2016 11:45 am
Forum: News
Topic: Versions 1.9.0 & 1.8.1
Replies: 181
Views: 182973

Re: Versions 1.9.0 & 1.8.1

Should I re-install v1.8.1? Or go back to v1.5.x? 4 meg router? Go back or 1.6.2 if 8 meg router, use http://www.gargoyle-router.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8765 Thanks. I will monitor the performance and go back to 1.6.2 if issue persists. I reverted back to 1.6.2 and it seems to be more st...