Search found 15 matches

by tester
Sat May 11, 2019 12:39 pm
Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
Topic: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5
Replies: 211
Views: 35612

Re: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5

RomanHK wrote:


When we rename 46-ipt-imq to ipt-imq it starts to load earlier or later? I thought that numbers are loading earlier, no?
by tester
Thu May 09, 2019 4:14 pm
Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
Topic: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5
Replies: 211
Views: 35612

Re: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5

For b): How then we can detect this bug with a script? Yours `cat /proc/net/ip_tables_names | grep nat` is not enough now, it's only for case 'a'. (only a new router restart will help) Do you try smth like this: /etc/init.d/firewall stop /etc/init.d/qos_gargoyle restart /etc/init.d/firewall start W...
by tester
Thu May 09, 2019 12:36 pm
Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
Topic: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5
Replies: 211
Views: 35612

Re: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5

a) Sometimes the IMQ driver is loaded in parallel with the NAT driver and then the Internet is not running, the log does not show errors. b) NAT is loaded first and then the error "Error hooking IMQ" appears in the log. c) IMQ driver loads first, then NAT driver (not concurrently) and int...
by tester
Wed May 08, 2019 4:54 pm
Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
Topic: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5
Replies: 211
Views: 35612

Re: Gargoyle 1.11.0 Release Candidate 5

Hmm, I confirm, it helped me to delay the start-up time of the IMQ driver - as you can see, other machines are too tight and the time is not enough. Can you please clarify, do you always have that error message 'Error hooking IMQ' when you get non-working NAT after reboot or not? Just in the begini...
by tester
Wed May 08, 2019 4:36 pm
Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
Topic: Experimental build of Gargoyle 1.11.0 for ipq806x architecture routers
Replies: 65
Views: 21271

Re: Experimental build of Gargoyle 1.11.0 for ipq806x architecture routers

WAN connection under PPPoE appeared to be successful at the GUI, but I couldn't estabilish any connection just a brainstorming thought on this non-working WAN I think it's the same bug as here: https://www.gargoyle-router.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=11829&start=80#p51660 https://www.garg...