Search found 1373 matches
- Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:35 pm
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: Wireless Repeater Woes
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5980
Re: Wireless Repeater Woes
Yeah I am using a WRT54G-TM. You have my sympathy on the proprietary driver. Whats your opinion on the scan sensitivity issue that I mentioned? There are some notes in the DD-WRT Wiki http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Repeater_Bridge about trying to use a common SSID in repeater mode. Maybe you s...
- Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:42 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: disabling QOS
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7726
Re: disabling QOS
To confirm if your QOS is disables you can login into your router using SSH and type the command line "iptables -t mangle -vnL"
The mangle tables should not have the qos scripts listed.
What is the speed issue that concerns you?
The mangle tables should not have the qos scripts listed.
What is the speed issue that concerns you?
- Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:39 am
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: Wireless Repeater Woes
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5980
Wireless Repeater Woes
I have had occasion recently to try the Gargoyle wireless repeater function. After many hours of working with it I have had limited success. The first this I want to mention is that the "SCAN" function on the Connection->Basic screen does not seem very sensitive. My laptop can see a dozen ...
- Fri Sep 04, 2009 11:43 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Suggestions/Observations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5750
Re: Suggestions/Observations
On A) above it would be cool also to list the QoS classification of the connection. One more column I know but would be helpful in ensuring that connections are properly classified.
- Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:47 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Gargoyle Raw Performance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10862
Re: Gargoyle Raw Performance
Interesting results DoesItMatter. It seems your Fonera box is very much slower than the WRT54G.
But it also is interesting to me that your upload / download speeds are the same. There is a significant difference on my setup.
Eric,
Any ideas why the bandwidth is not asymmetric?
But it also is interesting to me that your upload / download speeds are the same. There is a significant difference on my setup.
Eric,
Any ideas why the bandwidth is not asymmetric?
- Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:24 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Gargoyle Raw Performance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10862
Re: Gargoyle Raw Performance
Ok but I used two computers in my house to do this testing. Using your ISP will most likely affect your results and not show the true performance of the router and give confusing results due to issues like you mentioned. Instead I recommend you copy a large file from one computer to another. One com...
- Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:57 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Torrent downloader
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7138
Re: Torrent downloader
I know someone who runs rtorrent on his router. The router has a connected USB hard disk that stores the data. A way cool application for OpenWRT on a router.
- Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:46 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Gargoyle Raw Performance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10862
Re: Gargoyle Raw Performance
In the results I shared above QoS was off on all platforms and no special services running. Service would not affect the results anyway unless they consume bandwidth or CPU time. I also tried disabling the Gargoyle bandwidth monitor by running "iptables -t mangle -F" to remove all chains f...
- Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:23 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Gargoyle Raw Performance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10862
Gargoyle Raw Performance
Over the last few days I took some measurements of the raw performance I can achieve on my 200Mhz broadcom router under Gargoyle and a few other software packages. Downloading speed (WAN -> LAN) Gargoyle 3600 KiB/sec CoovaAP (based on whiterussian): 3600 KiB/sec DD-WRT v24SP2 4300KiB/sec The upload ...
- Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:32 pm
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: Mozilla Parsing Warnings
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2397
Mozilla Parsing Warnings
Eric,
Not sure you are aware that there are several "warnings" resulting from your common.css file in under Mozilla 3.5.2 under XP.
One property and two values are not recognized.
These can be generated by view the status page
Not sure you are aware that there are several "warnings" resulting from your common.css file in under Mozilla 3.5.2 under XP.
One property and two values are not recognized.
These can be generated by view the status page