Search found 14 matches
- Fri Oct 16, 2015 1:26 am
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Prioritizing ACK/SYN/FIN/RST packets
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12754
Re: Prioritizing ACK/SYN/FIN/RST packets
Yeah gargoyle's rules give you quite a bit of flexibility. I actually ended up having only one upload class (in class bandwidth sharing for basically free is awesome and the biggest advantage to sfq) and two download classes. One of which is set to %99 with a minimal bandwidth minimum and minimize R...
- Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:39 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: sfq depth
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13596
Re: sfq depth
Just as an aside I did find an elegant solution (without even having to jack with the stock scripts) that basically allows sfq in many ways to emulate fq_codel without losing any of the gargoyle advantages. What I did was simply make two classes for both upload and download. For both I assigned %75 ...
- Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:38 am
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: sfq depth
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13596
Re: sfq depth
Yeah I have played around quite a bit with openwrt including cc but fq_codel doesn't handle torrents any better and then I lose both in class equal bandwidth sharing (changing hashing key on fq_codel doesn't return near as consistent results as sfq) and the really killer gargoyle feature on the fly ...
- Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:51 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: sfq depth
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13596
Re: sfq depth
I ended up backing out the change. I was still able to fubar Netflix with several Steam game downloads on another computer (great test btw) using a single upload and download class for all connections (which works remarkably well %99 of the time). Also the qos script had set the download speed to li...
- Thu Sep 10, 2015 9:56 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: sfq depth
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13596
Re: sfq depth
Could have been the one time was due to you seeding to multiple people heavily which is often harder to replicate. A lot of home users have less upload bandwidth and upload is where most latency comes from in my experience (at least in the consumer router space). That could have been a case where ev...
- Thu Sep 10, 2015 1:01 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: sfq depth
- Replies: 12
- Views: 13596
sfq depth
Isn't the way that the gargoyle qos system is setup with sfq, one of the big goals is fairness in sharing of bandwidth between different ips in the same class? Also isn't the only way to truly achieve this is to have the sfq depth smaller than the sfq limit? The way I understand sfq is once a hash b...
- Sat Mar 28, 2015 9:06 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: dnssec?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5013
Re: dnssec?
is the overhead a problem? Not for my wndr3700v2 but yes it does generate more port 53 traffic (obviously). I am not sure there would be much more overhead if the dnssec support was compiled in (but not enabled by default) other than than the gargoyle image would be bigger due to the binary being b...
- Sat Mar 28, 2015 1:39 am
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: dnssec?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5013
dnssec?
It should be possible to build the default dnsmasq included with gargoyle with at least dnssec support compiled in. I ended up building it myself using dnsmasq-full to fully get dnssec working ( with dnssec-check-unsigned working woot) but this will be a hassle to do every gargoyle release. I also h...
- Tue Jan 27, 2015 11:17 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Ghost vulnerability
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2798
Ghost vulnerability
It looks like OpenWRT and Gargoyle are not vulnerable because uClibc isn't vulnerable (glibc and eglibc are) but this is another big one that will get fixed rapidly on the desktop but may sit in the embedded world for quite some time. Also it looks like pppd is one of the apps that can be used to ex...
- Wed Jun 11, 2014 4:22 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: gargoyle and fq_codel
- Replies: 13
- Views: 18295
Re: gargoyle and fq_codel
Yeah basically if you have to ask you probably should be using the dsl modem as a transparent bridge. pbix is right I did have to do things by hand on DSL router which you would get free by using a transparent bridge (this also includes having to setup a manual target for ACC). Can't remember for su...