Gargoyle Forum

Hi Lantis,
Been trying the new 2026-01-28 release for a couple days. I confirm that Wireguard now works great, even when DHCP assignment is enabled. And the GUI issue when selecting 802.11n over 5GHz is indeed fixed.
Thanks a lot for this new build !

Lantis wrote: I've put in a fix for this, I'll release some new builds in the next week which hopefully solve this. This is one of those weird changes between iptables and nftables and they behave unexpectedly differently when it comes to these rules. Looks like in the old rules they were being ski...

Thanks for this quick response. I unfortunately need forced DCHP assignment and wireguard. For now, I have reverted back to some older 23.05-based image on my G10. Hence I am clearly not blocked. Anyhow, feel free to share some trial WNDR3700v4 image, whenever you have time to look into it, and I'll...

Hi Lantis, I've been struggling with BETA - 2025-10-24 for quite a while trying to setup a wireguard server on my ASRock G10. While my wireguard setup worked perfectly fine with openwrt 23.05 codebase, it fails with latest 24.10 builds. In fact, with 24.10-based builds, wireguard client can successf...

Thanks a lot for those figures. Although they do not fully confirm the 50% slow-down I observed, they clearly show that I should consider an upgrade to some more recent hardware ! By the way, from your past experience, do you believe that the SoC difference could explain a higher bandwidth impact of...

Thanks for proposing this crosscheck. That would certainly be a very valuable reference datapoint.

Hello, I've been using Gargoyle v1.12.0 (then v1.12.X pulled from gargoyle{dot}romanhk{dot}cz/1.12.x/) on a WNDR3700v4 router since early 2020, with great success. In fact, I moved to Gargoyle because of Covid-19: Myself and my wife working from home + 2 teenagers spending their time with online gam...