Search found 38 matches

by Adri
Fri Jul 15, 2016 3:26 am
Forum: News
Topic: Version 1.9.1
Replies: 188
Views: 44875

Re: Version 1.9.1

Anyone using a bridge config shouldn't preserve settings. Because we updated the way bridges are handled. Yeah.... And this is documented where? On the download page, it is said preserve setting is possible between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1! Also the client bridge is no longer working as a bridge. It is now ...
by Adri
Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:56 am
Forum: News
Topic: Version 1.9.1
Replies: 188
Views: 44875

Re: Version 1.9.1

Lantis, I also did a sysupgrade and a Linksys WRT160NL from 1.9.0 to 1.9.1, using 'preserve settings'. The update was succeeded, but afterwards the router went into a 'boot loop'. I solved it by using the standard Openwrt 'recovery button', telnet into the router and issuing a 'firstboot'. It seems ...
by Adri
Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:36 am
Forum: News
Topic: Version 1.9.1
Replies: 188
Views: 44875

Re: Version 1.9.1

I'm not sure why, but for some reason when I did the initial build a few of the ar71xx devices including the 160nl produced invalid firmware images. I did a new build, and re-uploaded, and this time everything seems fine. Please let me know if you see any other images that are corrupted. Thanks Eri...
by Adri
Thu Jul 07, 2016 7:44 am
Forum: News
Topic: Version 1.9.1
Replies: 188
Views: 44875

Re: Version 1.9.1

Both the factory and sysupgrade images for the wrt160nl are corrupt.
Size is less then 1Kb.

I just bricked my router flashing!
by Adri
Mon May 30, 2016 4:28 am
Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
Topic: NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?
Replies: 8
Views: 872

Re: NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?

It seems gargoyle is not really suited for IPV6.
Installing OpenWRT CC has IPV6 support out of the box and after installing the 6in4 package, setting up a tunnel is straight forward.
by Adri
Wed May 25, 2016 3:39 am
Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
Topic: NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?
Replies: 8
Views: 872

Re: NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?

Thanks,

I'll have a look at the netfilter configuration and see if it can be adapted.
by Adri
Tue May 24, 2016 11:02 am
Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
Topic: NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?
Replies: 8
Views: 872

Re: NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?

Lantis, Before I go the route of installling all ipv6 modules and configuring the tunnel on Gargoyle, I'd like to try geting the NAT working first. All that is needed for this is generic ipv4 support. no special modules etc are needed, everything is in the kernel with ipv4. Can you point me to the r...
by Adri
Tue May 24, 2016 6:57 am
Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
Topic: NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?
Replies: 8
Views: 872

Re: NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?

6in4 packets for the tunnel are encapsulated in ipv4 IP packets, using protocol type 41. This means for gargoyle and NAT, it is just a normal ipv4 IP packet, except with a different type. How is the NAT handled in Gargoyle? If I can add the extra protocol type to the standard NAT, I don't need any i...
by Adri
Mon May 23, 2016 4:21 pm
Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
Topic: NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?
Replies: 8
Views: 872

NAT for protocol 41 (ipv6 encapsulation) working?

I am trying to setup a 6in4 tunnel to Hurricane Electrics tunnel broker. Using stock firmware on a Netgear WNDR3700v1, this works fine with my local ipv4 address of 192.168.1.3. The stock firmware automatically does NAT for protocol 41 and is based on a very old version of OpenWRT. Using the exact s...
by Adri
Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:20 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Better WiFi settings
Replies: 11
Views: 2136

Re: Better WiFi settings

I think in a busy and constantly changing wifi enviroment, like these days on the old 2.4 Ghz band, it might improve reception and speed. Trying to find a free or least busy channel on startup is fine, but there is no guarantee this will be the best channel available forever. The same problem exists...

Go to advanced search