For first time installation :
http://www.gargoyle-router.com/download ... actory.bin
Upgrading to other versions use the "sysupgrade" binaries
Cheers
Search found 9 matches
- Sun Jul 24, 2011 2:26 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Gargoyle and Bullet M2
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3742
- Wed Jul 06, 2011 4:00 pm
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: WR1043ND - Problem with Port Forwarding
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2938
Re: WR1043ND - Problem with Port Forwarding
Thanks for the explanation. As the above configuration was (and is) working on a TL-WR741, so I assumed that it's a bug with he 1043. Can you help me set up something similar to protect my private lan? The situation is: My private lan is 10.0.0.0 with a gateway of 10.0.0.1 The routers output is setu...
- Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:15 pm
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: WR1043ND - Problem with Port Forwarding
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2938
WR1043ND - Problem with Port Forwarding
Port forwarding does not work when the wan (10.0.0.0) subnet is restricted from lan (192.168.1.1). lan to wan firewall config 'restriction_rule' 'rule_2' option 'is_ingress' '0' option 'description' '10-0' option 'remote_addr' '10.0.0.2-10.0.0.254' option 'proto' 'both' option 'enabled' '1' port for...
- Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:48 am
- Forum: Other Issues
- Topic: WR1043ND - v1.3.16 - Access Restriction disappearing
- Replies: 13
- Views: 11823
Re: WR1043ND - v1.3.16 - Access Restriction disappearing
I can also confirm with a 1043
- Fri May 13, 2011 3:38 pm
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Suggestion: redirect when Restriction rule applied
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5069
Re: Suggestion: redirect when Restriction rule applied
+1 on that.
But I think that it's a captive portal thing.
So I believe that unless captive portal is implemented, it isn't possible.
Let's see what Eric has to say.
Cheers,
sda
Greece
But I think that it's a captive portal thing.
So I believe that unless captive portal is implemented, it isn't possible.
Let's see what Eric has to say.
Cheers,
sda
Greece
- Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:35 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Throttle Bandwidth / Bandwidth Sharing
- Replies: 21
- Views: 31659
Re: Throttle Bandwidth / Bandwidth Sharing
Hi, You can easily install nocatsplash as a simple captive portal. From the command line do: opkg update opkg install nocatsplash Save the following script as "nocatsplash" in the /etc/init.d/ directory: *********************************************** #!/bin/sh /etc/rc.common START=49 star...
- Mon Mar 28, 2011 5:02 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Throttle Bandwidth / Bandwidth Sharing
- Replies: 21
- Views: 31659
Re: Throttle Bandwidth / Bandwidth Sharing
Hi, If you don't have too many "clients" you could insert individual IP's for each rule. I have a DHCP pool of 15 clients, and have made 15 rules, as IP range gave me the problem you described. You can block the rest so they can't log in using static IP's out of your pool (without rules) C...
- Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:43 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Quotas per IP/IP Range +MAC
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3525
Re: Quotas per IP/IP Range +MAC
Thank you for your input. I'll try it out and let you know of the outcome. BTW has anyone have any experience with Gargoyle + Nocatsplash? I've successfully installed version 0.93 pre2. It seems to work OK upon testing with a couple of PC's I have.I don't know how it will respond on the field with 1...
- Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:28 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Quotas per IP/IP Range +MAC
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3525
Quotas per IP/IP Range +MAC
Is it possible to set quotas per IP or IP range in conjunction with it's recorded (at login) MAC address? An example to explain, as I am no expert in terminology. I have a dhcp pool from 192.168.1.2-10 Someone logs in and acquires an address (example 192.168.1.2), meets the set quota, then logs off....