I have WR841ND, which is the same chipset as in WR1043ND.
Firmware Gargoyle 1.3.7
Wi-Fi (WDS+AP) is working pretty well, I was using it as AP (AP+WDS) for couple of weeks, with another router doing routing.
Connected WR841ND to WAN interface today.
Connection: PPPoE
Router connects to provider, and I can open web sites, etc.
But it seems connection is somewhat unstable.
Here is what I get for ping'ing Google from Windows Vista connected to router via Ethernet cable
Code: Select all
>ping -t www.google.com
Обмен пакетами с www.l.google.com [209.85.149.147] с 32 байтами данных:
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=75мс TTL=55
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=74мс TTL=55
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=74мс TTL=55
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=75мс TTL=55
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=73мс TTL=55
Превышен интервал ожидания для запроса.
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=75мс TTL=55
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=77мс TTL=55
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=69мс TTL=55
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=74мс TTL=55
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=74мс TTL=55
Превышен интервал ожидания для запроса.
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=75мс TTL=55
Ответ от 209.85.149.147: число байт=32 время=76мс TTL=55
Статистика Ping для 209.85.149.147:
Пакетов: отправлено = 14, получено = 12, потеряно = 2
(14% потерь)
Приблизительное время приема-передачи в мс:
Минимальное = 69мсек, Максимальное = 77 мсек, Среднее = 74 мсек
2 lost packets out of 14.
I never had something like this.
In particular: with WR1043ND, which uses stock factory firmware
Tested same IP address (
www.google.com) from router
Code: Select all
root@Gargoyle:~# ping www.google.com
no response.
It seems host name is not resolved
Now try same IP address as from Windows PC
Code: Select all
root@Gargoyle:~# ping 209.85.149.147
PING 209.85.149.147 (209.85.149.147): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=2 ttl=56 time=75.752 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=3 ttl=56 time=75.131 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=4 ttl=56 time=71.792 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=5 ttl=56 time=74.593 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=6 ttl=56 time=76.141 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=12 ttl=56 time=73.124 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=13 ttl=56 time=74.450 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=14 ttl=56 time=76.032 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=15 ttl=56 time=75.084 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=16 ttl=56 time=70.611 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=23 ttl=56 time=74.085 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=24 ttl=56 time=75.401 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.149.147: seq=25 ttl=56 time=75.020 ms
^C
--- 209.85.149.147 ping statistics ---
27 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, 51% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 70.611/74.401/76.141 ms
51% packet loss. Wow!
There is a real problem.
Would like to know opinion form developers or users who use Gargoyle 1.3.7 as router (with WAN connectivity) - what can be wrong, and what settings they are using.
)