is this a bug in the TP-Link TL-WR1043N/ND v2 firmware ?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 8:44 am
Hey guys, longtime user, recent poster. Anyway, I got a new TP-Link TL-WR1043N/ND v2 and have the 1.8 firmware running on it.
Setting up my QOS download rules, I noticed that none of the traffic rules worked in the default setup. In the QoS (Download) -- Classification Rules by default it has traffic setup like this example "Source Port: 80, Connection bytes: 1024 kBytes" as the port 80 over 1024 rule.
I monitored it, but no traffic moved in that "normal" group. I thought about it for a second and thought that any traffic hitting the router , the packets would be looking for a destination so I changed it to" Destination Port: 80, Connection bytes: 1024 kBytes" and traffic started to flow properly. I changed all of my download rules to "Destination" instead of "Source".
I went back to the upload QOS and the same thing in reverse applied here, all the rules are setup for destination but I reversed it to source for the rules on upload and it all seems to be flowing properly.
I don't know if someone mixed those up in just this firmware, or something has changed. I just wanted to bring that to someone's attention.
the 2nd thing I noticed is that the QOS rules in 1.8 work fine by Ip address and with CIDR rules on Ip, but they don't appear to be working by port. As a test, I created a "TEST" qos group and threw my pc into that group by IP. I can see traffic moving but if I also add "destination port 80" to the rule, the traffic no longer shows up when browsing the web on port 80.
I have run several tests with different factors, but it all seems to point to the fact that port filtering on QOS is not working. can anyone confirm that or is it just this version of firmware for this router.
Currently, I just have all my QOS rules setup by CIDR groups but would like a little more control over it.
Setting up my QOS download rules, I noticed that none of the traffic rules worked in the default setup. In the QoS (Download) -- Classification Rules by default it has traffic setup like this example "Source Port: 80, Connection bytes: 1024 kBytes" as the port 80 over 1024 rule.
I monitored it, but no traffic moved in that "normal" group. I thought about it for a second and thought that any traffic hitting the router , the packets would be looking for a destination so I changed it to" Destination Port: 80, Connection bytes: 1024 kBytes" and traffic started to flow properly. I changed all of my download rules to "Destination" instead of "Source".
I went back to the upload QOS and the same thing in reverse applied here, all the rules are setup for destination but I reversed it to source for the rules on upload and it all seems to be flowing properly.
I don't know if someone mixed those up in just this firmware, or something has changed. I just wanted to bring that to someone's attention.
the 2nd thing I noticed is that the QOS rules in 1.8 work fine by Ip address and with CIDR rules on Ip, but they don't appear to be working by port. As a test, I created a "TEST" qos group and threw my pc into that group by IP. I can see traffic moving but if I also add "destination port 80" to the rule, the traffic no longer shows up when browsing the web on port 80.
I have run several tests with different factors, but it all seems to point to the fact that port filtering on QOS is not working. can anyone confirm that or is it just this version of firmware for this router.
Currently, I just have all my QOS rules setup by CIDR groups but would like a little more control over it.