Gargoyle Forum

I have refreshed a number of the pages in the Documentation Wiki and would welcome your comments.

Apart from just generally tidying stuff up - I tried to make the initial experience a little less daunting for potential and new users (without removing the warnings).

I have tried to make the selection of suitable hardware a little clearer, and the simplicity of installing a Gargoyle image more apparent. I have de-emphasised the more technical route via OpenWRT but included frequent links to the OpenWRT info.

Hopefully this will result in fewer potential users being scared off!

Check out:
http://www.gargoyle-router.com/wiki/dok ... tion_index
http://www.gargoyle-router.com/wiki/dok ... ed_routers
http://www.gargoyle-router.com/wiki/doku.php?id=install
http://www.gargoyle-router.com/wiki/dok ... tall_guide
http://www.gargoyle-router.com/wiki/dok ... l-wr1043nd

Nit spelling.

https://www.gargoyle-router.com/wiki/do ... tall_guide

Garoyle is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR


should be.

Gargoyle is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR

Gargoyle will likely run on may other
should be.

Gargoyle will likely run on many other

Gargoyle should run on any router that uses a mips architechture,

should be.

Gargoyle should run on any router that uses a mips architecture,

If you install a Gargoyle image then the inital connection procedure is a little different than for OpenWrt.

should be.

If you install a Gargoyle image then the initial connection procedure is a little different than for OpenWrt.

Thanks for the updates to the docs. Looks good.

tapper wrote:Nit spelling.

Fixed! Two were mine and two have been there since inception
PS I dint no u kud spel

nworbnhoj wrote:

tapper wrote:Nit spelling.

Fixed! Two were mine and two have been there since inception
PS I dint no u kud spel

lol I cant spell. I actually felt a bit bad pointing them out to you but it's for a grater cause rite? lol

nworbnhoj wrote:I have refreshed a number of the pages in the Documentation Wiki and would welcome your comments.

I have added a "Common Scenarios" page to the Gargoyle Doco Wiki.
The idea is that sometimes a worked example is an easier route to learn than trawling thru a manual.
http://www.gargoyle-router.com/wiki/dok ... _scenarios

Comments welcome (and additional scenarios)

I always like to see improved documentation so thanks for that.

I enhanced the section router hardware. IMHO if you are buying a router to run Gargoyle you should always get at least 8MB of flash.

Also I looked at your

Shared Internet connection in a Student share house

scenario. My comment here is that in my experience gamers do not cause problems for other people. Online gaming uses very little bandwidth. It is the other users who cause the gaming experience to completely get disrupted and Gargoyle is helpful in carving out a little bandwidth for the gamer to be able to do what he does. So I am curious how you came up with these scenarios? Do you know of a situation that the gamer cause other people problems? Can you describe the particulars of that case? I think you may have the justification for this scenario backwards.

Thanks

Just going OT for the mo i have just bin looking at your site linked in your bio. It made me think of some books i red one time, by Robert J Sawyer.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWW_Trilogy

I can provide my own user experience for gaming setup if you like?
PBix is correct though. It's those pesky Facebook refreshes and YouTube videos that makes me miss headshots (not my own lack of skill )

This is great! Thank you for taking the time to help improve the documentation -- it is much appreciated!

(not my own lack of skill )

sure LOL