Gargoyle Forum

I have a problem with two difference builds of Gargoyle: the stable 1.4.7 and the last experimental 1.5.4
I have reset to default configuration, only this site is changed:

http://i45.tinypic.com/htb38y.jpg

I have NAS device on the one LAN port, and another Access point on another LAN port, from him i surfing in internet. The first router is one TL-WR1043ND with stock firmware v.3.13.10 Build 120210 Rel.62735n

The problem is: i can't access the NAS device under 192.168.1.100. In WR1043ND in "Address Reservation"i have make fixed ip address.
The strange one is, i have connection for nearly 10 minutes after reset to defaults and new configuration om second router, and then is lost.
When i choose "Connect via WDS" the first router ask always the direct client to this router for password under Ubuntu Linux. When i power off the second router and reboot the first, all is normal.

I like Gargoyle, i have better signal strength, but is for me useless with this problem. Have i make error with configuration?

With a stock firmware on the second router i have no problems, only slow speed with the NAS device with all linux clients.

Routing not working, i can't add rule with firefox or internet explorer

I find self the solution. Only this and DHCP site for fixed IP address of my NAS are changed:

http://i46.tinypic.com/2uhbe9x.jpg

Now i can access NAS device in another subnet mask as early with stock firmware.
I think, this was the reason: With the stock firmware TP-Link TL-WR941ND send all MAC addresses from LAN ports, i can see in first router TL-WR1043ND under "IP & MAC Binding"->"- ARP List": different MAC's and different local IP's
With Gargoyle as "Wireless Bridge/Repeater" , he send not all the MAC addresses, in first router under same MAC more different local IP's.
Now, where working as "Gateway (Default)" in first router only one MAC with one local IP.
With Firefox(Private Mode) i can't login in gargoyle under 192.168.0.6, but under 192.168.1.100. With Internet Explorer i haven't this access problem.

There is bug, but i think this is hardware bug: With stock or gargoyle: copy operation from NAS on LAN port via Wireless i have speed from 6 MB/sec, different channels tested/40 Mhz. With another access point speed from 11 Mb/sec.