Page 4 of 5
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 5:50 am
by Lantis
Try to follow the instructions at the different lines.
Your browser is trying to interpret the code from a minimised format into a full one. I'm surprised it got a different result, but that's fine.
The other alternative is to replace the minimised code with full size, but i am trying to keep it simple for you.
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 9:23 pm
by Lantis
Some of our Polish friends discovered the common factor in the display issue with Bandwidth Distribution. I've just pushed a patch which should take care of it.
Ultimately, it boils down to hostnames that are longer than 25 characters. This is allowed, but they are truncated for display purposes. This truncated value was being used to look up some data values which isn't correct.
https://github.com/ericpaulbishop/gargo ... 7112d6b62d
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 3:33 pm
by phgerin
Oh great, many thanks !
Indeed I have hostnames with more than 25 chars.
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 11:41 pm
by boldga
I try setting Wireguard config like this:
router1:server 192.168.3.1
router2 :client 192.168.1.1
Client-to-Client Traffic: allow clients to communicate to each others
LAN Subnet Access:allow clients to access host on lan
Clients Use Wireguard For:only traffic destined for hosts behind vpn
I can't connect from server side to client side. for example: can't connect from 192.168.3.101 to 192.168.1.1
But I have no problem when using openvpn with the same setting.
Is it a bug?
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 11:58 pm
by Lantis
Can you post your wireguard_gargoyle config here please? Redact any keys.
Also the output of "route" at the command line
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:17 am
by boldga
router1:
https://zenith-healthcare.com/wg1.jpg
https://zenith-healthcare.com/wg1-1.jpg
router2:
https://zenith-healthcare.com/wg2.jpg
router1 "route" output:
root@Gargoyle:~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
default 65-181-87-254.s 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 pppoe-wan
10.64.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 wg0
10.64.0.2 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 wg0
65.181.87.254 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 pppoe-wan
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 wg0
192.168.3.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br-lan
router2 "route" output:
root@Gargoyle:~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
default 1-141-19-223-on 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0.2
42.200.98.56 1-141-19-223-on 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0.2
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br-lan
192.168.3.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 wg0
223.19.141.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0.2
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:44 am
by Lantis
I'm getting a 403 on the second 2 pictures. I'll setup a test network to confirm in the meantime and come back to you.
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 2:17 am
by boldga
I have edited the URL of pics.
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 12:07 am
by Lantis
I just setup a test network and had no problems with communications in either direction from both subnets.
Have you tried a device behind the router (i.e. not 192.168.1.1) ?
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-December-14 23
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 5:50 am
by boldga
Lantis wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 12:07 am
I just setup a test network and had no problems with communications in either direction from both subnets.
Have you tried a device behind the router (i.e. not 192.168.1.1) ?
It doesn’t work either.
BTW, Router model is R7800 on both sides.
