Page 1 of 1

"GL-inet Domino Core" target

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 8:38 am
by DESK
Hello, I'am actually working with OpenWRT in my module, but I found too heavy and I would like to use Gargoyle.

Would be possible to implement the target GL-inet Domino Core to the lastest Gargoyle version?

Thanks in advance.
Jon

Re: "GL-inet Domino Core" target

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 9:16 am
by Lantis
Being a dev board its use cases are probably pretty limited and not mainstream.
But, i have just tested it and it compiles. So if you want to maintain your own version that is entirely doable.

Here's one you could try to begin with.
http://lantisproject.com/gargoyle_custo ... et-domino/

Re: "GL-inet Domino Core" target

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 2:34 am
by DESK
Lantis wrote:Being a dev board its use cases are probably pretty limited and not mainstream.
But, i have just tested it and it compiles. So if you want to maintain your own version that is entirely doable.

Here's one you could try to begin with.
http://lantisproject.com/gargoyle_custo ... et-domino/
Ok Lantis, thank you so much. I'm gonna try that FW.

Re: "GL-inet Domino Core" target

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 4:58 am
by ispyisail
also a bit under powered :(

Re: "GL-inet Domino Core" target

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 4:18 am
by DESK
Thank you for your responses,

I tested the FW you build and it seems to work fine. The only issue is that the bridge works with relayd in layer 3.

To solve that problem (to turn to layer 2), do you see possible to compile Gargoyle 1.8.1 for the "Domino" target?

Best regards,
Jon

Re: "GL-inet Domino Core" target

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 8:08 am
by Lantis
Depends on whether the device was supported in Openwrt back in barrier breaker (14.07).
If yes, it should be no problem, but not something I’m going to explore sorry. I leave it to you.
I only provided the above build because i had literally just finished a build which happened to contain it. Happy coincidence :)

Re: "GL-inet Domino Core" target

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 10:34 am
by DESK
Lantis wrote:Depends on whether the device was supported in Openwrt back in barrier breaker (14.07).
If yes, it should be no problem, but not something I’m going to explore sorry. I leave it to you.
I only provided the above build because i had literally just finished a build which happened to contain it. Happy coincidence :)
You have already helped me a lot providing me the 1.11 version, thank you.
Now it's my turn to investigate ;)

Best regards.
Jon