Page 1 of 2
fq_codel
Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 7:34 pm
by mestrefantasma
Hello! I'm sorry for my ignorance but I've been doing some research on fq_codel and from what I understand it could solve my bufferbloat problem, so I wish I could use it with Gargoyle, how could I do that?
Re: fq_codel
Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 10:09 pm
by ispyisail
Re: fq_codel
Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:00 pm
by mestrefantasma
I really like the gargoyle and it fills my needs with your QoS options and I would like to continue using it, so I wonder if there is an alternative that can be used with the gargoyle for the same situation. Thank you
Re: fq_codel
Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 6:10 am
by Lantis
Unfortunately not.
You would need to do your own modifications.
Some people looked into it a while ago if you search for fq_codel Gargoyle, but no appreciable results reached
Re: fq_codel
Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 7:49 am
by tapper
Hi when Gargoyle next upgrades to the LEDE code base there will be some fixes for bufferbloat, because some of the things to fix bufferbloat were built in to the kernel. So if you hang on for a bit things mite get better with Gargoyle. It could be some time be for that happens tho.
Re: fq_codel
Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 9:17 am
by Volaris
I was reading recently that Cake is somewhat of a successor or improvement to FQ_codel, and that it uses less resources. Is that something that could be compatible or a benefit to Gargoyle in the future?
https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake/
https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/co ... Technical/
http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2016/12 ... ulers.html
Re: fq_codel
Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 4:16 pm
by tapper
Not sure mate. we will have to wait and see.
Re: fq_codel
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:39 am
by pbix
Gargoyle QoS (ACC) is already a more comprehensive solution to the bufferbloat issue than fq_codel or any other passive solution can possibly be.
Testing with fq_codel in the past showed no benefit in the Gargoyle QoS architecture and introduced serious stability issues.
Gargoyle users can be assured that they do not suffer from bufferbloat issues when ACC is on. And kackle with amusement when non-users complain about it.
Re: fq_codel
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:48 am
by tapper
Hi pbix are you the one who rote the QOS and ACC softwair for Gargoyle?
Re: fq_codel
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:48 pm
by pbix
The original design of both I did. Since then others have contributed as well.