A forum to discuss the Gargoyle web interface for Openwrt
https://www.gargoyle-router.com/phpbb/
First reason is silly ("to [sic] much hard work"...for whom?). Second clearly legitimate. Plenty of older 4 MB routers serve basic needs well without all of the bells & whistles. Fully stable on current Gargoyle builds.tapper wrote:IMO 4MB routers should be dropped all together! To much hard work to keep telling people that 4MB routers are unstable. When Gargoyle mooves to a later Kernel and ver of LEDE / OpenWRT I don't think that we will be able to get a build to fit in a 4MB router.
I think we first have to wait for the LEDE/OpenWrt remerge.prichard wrote:I love gargoyle, but I want to ask a question: is not it time for a stable build (2.0?)?
Hard work for me to keep repeating my self! It gets old you know! |-(Davey126 wrote:First reason is silly ("to [sic] much hard work"...for whom?). Second clearly legitimate. Plenty of older 4 MB routers serve basic needs well without all of the bells & whistles. Fully stable on current Gargoyle builds.tapper wrote:IMO 4MB routers should be dropped all together! To much hard work to keep telling people that 4MB routers are unstable. When Gargoyle mooves to a later Kernel and ver of LEDE / OpenWRT I don't think that we will be able to get a build to fit in a 4MB router.
Try LANHeathkit wrote:Latest Archer C7
Cannot access through Wan port.
Have tried ports 8080 and 90 on http only but does not seem to work.
Yes - it is "hard work" singing the same old song under the same old set of assumptions that may not apply to all. I have Gargoyle 1.9.2 installed on two 4 MB routers that have been rock solid with this build and several prior ones. One reason I stick with this firmware. I have no issue dropping support for older/smaller routers as newer builds emerge. Seems you are advocating a complete withdraw of those older builds for no other reason that drawing a philosophical line in the sand. Silly (if I read the intent correctly).tapper wrote:Hard work for me to keep repeating my self! It gets old you know! |-(Davey126 wrote:First reason is silly ("to [sic] much hard work"...for whom?). Second clearly legitimate. Plenty of older 4 MB routers serve basic needs well without all of the bells & whistles. Fully stable on current Gargoyle builds.tapper wrote:IMO 4MB routers should be dropped all together! To much hard work to keep telling people that 4MB routers are unstable. When Gargoyle mooves to a later Kernel and ver of LEDE / OpenWRT I don't think that we will be able to get a build to fit in a 4MB router.
4 meg routers are not stable on Gargoyle unless you leev all the things that make OpenWRT in to Gargoyle turned off. Even LEDE is having some trouble on 4 meg routers like opkg messing up and running out of memmory. There is people on the OpenWRT /LEDE forums and on IRC complaining about it all the time.