Page 3 of 3
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-September-07 00
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 4:03 am
by SirSWE
Does 160mhz work with newer builds on gargoyle? Having a wrt32x
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-September-07 00
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 5:24 am
by Lantis
As long as you have a device from an appropriate region and don't have any radar interference.
However it may not work for long, as the DFS detection on those devices is awful.
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-September-07 00
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:10 am
by JohnPeterson
Model:Linksys WRT1900AC (Built 20200907-0057 git@70cb60a5)
Hi this is working fine - Uptime:20 days, 2 hours, 0 minutes
I chose preserve settings / sorry - - I don't have any bandwidth charts.. I will reset to default if I have to - thanks.
///////////////////////////////////////////////
Graphs are working again - upgraded to
1.13.X (Built 20201101-2032 git@baf1954f)
Model:Linksys WRT1900AC
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-September-07 00
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:01 pm
by maphew
Lantis wrote: ↑Mon Sep 14, 2020 9:22 am
Please understand the difference between ar71xx and ath79 before flashing, and do not preserve settings.
https://openwrt.org/docs/techref/targets/ath79 says:
ath79 is the successor of ar71xx. It's modernization under the hood, with the main goal to bring the code into a form that is acceptable for Linux upstream, so that all (most) of the whole ar71xx supported devices can be handled by an upstream, unpatched Linux kernel.)
Combined with "Step 1: check support for your device" of
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/ins ... x.to.ath79
Are these enough to understand the difference in context of Gargoyle or is there more I should read?
I have a TP-Link Archer-C7 AC1750, Hardware Version: Archer C7 v3 00000000.
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-September-07 00
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:35 pm
by RomanHK
maphew wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:01 pm
Lantis wrote: ↑Mon Sep 14, 2020 9:22 am
Please understand the difference between ar71xx and ath79 before flashing, and do not preserve settings.
https://openwrt.org/docs/techref/targets/ath79 says:
ath79 is the successor of ar71xx. It's modernization under the hood, with the main goal to bring the code into a form that is acceptable for Linux upstream, so that all (most) of the whole ar71xx supported devices can be handled by an upstream, unpatched Linux kernel.)
Combined with "Step 1: check support for your device" of
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/ins ... x.to.ath79
Are these enough to understand the difference in context of Gargoyle or is there more I should read?
I have a TP-Link Archer-C7 AC1750, Hardware Version: Archer C7 v3 00000000.
Archer C7
v3 is the same as Archer C7
v2, so you should use these files:

Check the EU or US version of the label on the bottom of the router - if this information is not there, use the universal version.
from OEM (TP-Link EU!) to Gargoyle:
http://gargoyle.romanhk.cz/index.php?di ... ory-eu.bin
from OEM (TP-Link US!) to Gargoyle:
http://gargoyle.romanhk.cz/index.php?di ... ory-us.bin
from OEM (TP-Link universal) to Gargoyle:
http://gargoyle.romanhk.cz/index.php?di ... actory.bin
from Gargoyle (OpenWrt) to Gargoyle:
http://gargoyle.romanhk.cz/index.php?di ... pgrade.bin
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-September-07 00
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:13 pm
by maphew
[quote=RomanHK post_id=57527 time=1603989338
from Gargoyle (OpenWrt) to Gargoyle:
http://gargoyle.romanhk.cz/index.php?di ... pgrade.bin
[/quote]
Thank you Roman! This one seems to work, though I'll need to wait a few weeks for true confidence.
Re: 1.13.0.x gargoyle-ispy 2020-September-07 00
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:41 pm
by Lantis
The main thing I want people to recognise is that the architecture is wildly different, and that preserving settings between ar71xx and ath79 is never going to be a good idea.
